Wilmington, the train was moving along and made a sudden jerk like it was going to make an abrupt stop. This isnt the slowdown during the a curve. It came to a complete stop, there was smoke, smelt like the brakes were smoldering so we sat there wondering what had happened. The electricity was knocked out so there was no pa system. So the rumors started to fly but after about 25 minutes one of the crew came back and started to explain what happened. The first two cars were hit badly but we were lucky to be in the next to last car of the train so we felt the impact obviously but didnt get to smashup that the first two cars had. They hit, it was explained, a device on the track. They were doing maintenance and of course an investigation will be to be looked into why that was on the tracks while the train was coming. You are taught at an early age in science that when an object like a train is moving 80 Miles Per Hour it takes a long time to come to a halt. Host this is around the identif
50 or 60 . The problem is, all the other risks involved. Even if you have this one woman why are we changing the policy based on one woman . The problem is this is just about a couple of women who want to. First of all, now women are subject to involuntary assignment, because that is what repealing the combat exception means. The women who are willing and maybe able, when they succumb to their two to ten times greater risk of injury, their replacements are going to come from the pool of the unwilling, and most women in the marine corps and in the overall forces are not interested in the infantry. Right now, we dont have any who have applied of the ones who were in that integration study or who have gone through Marine Infantry Training battalions. We had a lot of trouble finding any women who want to. This is a deterrent for recruitment as well. There is a 2012 study of the marine corps, 54,000 covered, thatfound that, about 4 of women who are staying and would not stay in if involunta
Now book tvs indepth program with williams. He tackles many issues including race, education, environment, health care and more. Host Walter Williams. You writemo its difficult to ba goodte economist an be certify perceived as compassionist. Often one hasre to avoid unpleasant questions. Guest that is absolutely right. To be a good economist you have to y look at cause and effect. Something, someone has to tal about cost. A lot of times people dont like to talk about costs. Host is an economist a coldblooded creatures . Guest i dont think so. I think i am a nice person. One of my issues, to help understand me, my initial premise is the each own ourselves. I am my private prope that he is ai am my private property in you are your private property. If you accept the idea of some ownership theacn cecpter ttain e moral internet acts are in mora lets say the reason what rape is immoral is because it violates private property. Murder violates private property and sodas theft. Does so, i thin
To be a good economist you look at cause and effect. Many times people dont want to see cause and effect. And economists will always talk about cost, when people talk about a benefit to doing something, someone has to talk about cost. A lot of times people dont like to talk about costs. Host is an economist a coldblooded creatures . Guest i dont think so. I think i am a nice person. One of my issues, to help understand me, my initial premise is the each own ourselves. I am my private property and you are your private property. If you accept the idea of self ownership, certain ask check requests are more lancer nicks are immoral. Race is immoral because it violates private property, murder is immoral, it violates private property and so does that. I think you can get a fairly good vision of how the world should be from a moral point of view because you look at the initial premise. Host what about the concept of the common thing . Guest the common good doesnt make a lot of sense whatsoev
Including race, education, the environment, health care andd m. More. Host Walter Williams inter your most recent book american in contempt for liberty, you write its difficult to be a good economist and simultaneouslyved perceived as compassionate. Mp oo be asasion g od economist one has to deal with three out threey, t audi of the two appear topassionate often one has avoid unpleasant questions. Oid p that is absolutely right tor. Te a good economist, you have to look at the cause and effect and many times people dont want toa see cause and effect and so an economist will also talk about cost that is when people talk about the benefit that they are doing something, someone has to talk about cost and a lot of times people dont like to talk about cost. Host is a coldblooded creature . Guest i think one of my issues is my initial premise we each go to ourselves i and my private property and you are your property. If you accept the self ownership, then certain acts are moral and immoral.