supposed to be sunsetted two years ago. the beauty of taking this into 2013 is president obama would have to do his state of the union and explain why he could not get a fiscal cliff deal. he would have to explain why he could not get a debt sealing deal. why republicans didn t use their leverage into 2013 is amazing and hopefulfully they will. i m watching senator harry reid and mcconnell, they re you canning about how this will avoid tax increases on the poor and middle class. it s the exact opposite. there are no jobs and this are no companies without investment first. when you raise taxes on top earners, you by definition lower the earning potential of the poor and middle class. it s a terrible deal for all americans. one thing they have done now, john, is if the house passes this going forward then the democrats will not have that gigantic club of being taoeubl say republicans are sticking up for millionaires and
what happened. kand doo canada for the most part missed out on that recession that crippled this country. we re still suffering from it. they ve grown much fachter than most of the countries in comparable size. we have examples thousand does help a nation when you lower that rate? absolutely. first of all steen put it betve but-of-put it better that i could ever say on the show. one of the things to make clear, we want people to invest in american companies. if we lower the corporate tax rate as canada did, it makes us a much more desirable country for other countries to invest in. i m going see, rick s made a deal with some of us. john tamny are you onboard, maybe turn the corporate tax rate into a sample case for a flat rate across the board? absolutely. i say it a lot but there are no companies and no jobs without investment first. and we live in this world where if i spend all my money on booze and women the government doesn t tax me but if i have the temerity to invempt in t