officers. ., ~ , question about cuts to police officers. . ~ , , , question about cuts to police officers- iti question about cuts to police l officers. it is question about cuts to police - officers. it is more officers. makes sense. it is more comp located officers. makes sense. it is more comp located than officers. makes sense. it is more comp located than that, officers. makes sense. it is more comp located than that, i officers. makes sense. it is more comp located than that, i am - officers. makes sense. it is more comp located than that, i am trying | comp located than that, i am trying to explain to you that we have got to explain to you that we have got to bring the public with it is more complicated than we have invested and we are securing more police officers on our streets and we recruited a further 8771 in the last year. but i really want to get a message out that we want to support women and girls in understanding what they can do if they feel
clean electricity standard because i want people to understand it is a solvable problem. we can do something here. but the way that i think it effects the way i m thinking about it, david, is in these in a few areas, one is mitigation, which we re just going to have to start doing a lot of investing in, making sure places have enough water, for instance, in the american west and places along the coast and figuring out how that s going to work and also what adam said there and i feel like there hasn t been enough focus on, we re going to have so suck some carbon out of the air. and i don t know where that is right now. where is it? the technology exists to do it with machines. it s pretty expensive. it s a lot more expensive to it s cheaper to avoid putting carbon in the atmosphere than to take it out once it s up there. many natural solutions like tree planting and other forms of natural carbon capture or carbon
problem. it s a smarter part of the larger problem, in that people feel like china has been getting an advantage. what do you say to that? they re probably right. there s a legitimate case to be made that china does not engage in what we would describe in any sense of imagination of free trade. in terms of the way they subsidize industries and protect from we re not even talking about currency manipulation or those other things. yes, he has a legitimate beef. i would just say that there are other ways to protect american jobs. start by looking at income inequality, wage stagnation, maintaining a healthy, robust u.s. economy is probably the best way to serve the interests of the steelworkers and other workers across this country. i would think investing in, you know, modernizing of the u.s. infrastructure, high speed rail. there are lots of things that the trump administration could have done to address the concerns of steelworkers and other workers in this country who are hurti
larger problem, in that people feel like china has been getting an advantage. what do you say to that? they re probably right. there s a legitimate case to be made that china does not engage in what we would describe in any sense of imagination of free trade. in terms of the way they subsidize industries and protect from we re not even talking about currency manipulation or those other things. yes, he has a legitimate beef. i would just say that there are other ways to protect american jobs. start by looking at income inequality, wage stagnation, maintaining a healthy, robust u.s. economy is probably the best way to serve the interests of the steelworkers and other workers across this country. i would think investing in, you know, modernizing of the u.s. infrastructure, high speed rail. there are lots of things that the trump administration could have done to address the concerns of steelworkers and other workers in this country
would be a very good time to talk about training and education, investing in but we also need laws, eugene, because i don t care how much training you have, if a man is telling you that you pulled over as in the case of philando castile and he s telling you i have a licensed gun and you shoot seven times with this girlfriend sitting there and her young child sitting in the back seat, that s not a training problem that a jury let go. there is too much room in the law that allows you to do something as blatant as that yet they say it s not against the law. the laws need to be in my opinion to be refined and where there s not that much wiggle room to say, oh, i was just scared. shot seven times? baby in the back seat of the car. yeah, that might very well be true. the reality is that deadly force