. you see, i built what i built myself, and i did it by working long hours and working hard and working smart. more importantly than anything else by using my own brain. really? he did it all by himself? that s not what the bombshell the new york times investigation shows. with the new york state tax department investigating fraud, scams and more on the part of the trump family. that investigation puncturing what now appears to be the myth of the self-made man. it s not been easy for me. it has not been easy for me. it s a classic bootstrap story as the president paints it. i built a company that s worth more than $10 billion, okay? with a million dollar loan. turns out it was not a
president trump about these developments? is he saying anything about this investigation? yeah, president trump went in on on twitter already launching attacks at democrats suggesting that they won t be happy regardless of what the results of this investigation shows. he wrote, wow, just starting to hear that the democrats who are only thinking about object and delay are starting to put out toward that the time and scope of fbi looking into judge kavanaugh and witnesses is not enough. it will never be enough. stay tuned and watch. earlier today, kellyanne conway made it clear on state of the union that this was an investigation with a narrow focus designed to not become what she called a fishing expedition, ana. thank you, boris sanchez.
doing the investigation in order to bridge a gap, but i think republicans feel like politically they need the supreme court judge up there. i don t see it helping democrats. and, soon, looking ahead, what does next saturday s headline. will judge calf gnaw be on his way to becoming justice california gnaw? i actually think it will lead to more questions than answers. we ll see. do you think any of the democrats might cross the line? joe manchin it depends what the investigation shows. if it shows there s nothing more compelling to come out and he comes out clean if you will, cavanaugh, then you may see heidi heitkamp or joe manchin y manchinovers for sure. molly hooper, julia manchester, and susan del
speaking, we have to have enough votes to clear the guy. and we don t have them. what do we do to get there? maria, if the fbi investigation produces nothing definitive, will democrats accept it? i mean, if what you mean is will democrats vote yes on kavanaugh? i think that majority of them will still vote no. you might have a couple of red-state democrats vote yes given what the fbi investigation shows. we don t know what the fbi investigation will show. i still hold very strong that actually the most important thing here is not that republicans get to 51 votes. most important thing here is that we ensure that one of nine supreme court justices don t go on to the highest court in the land with this kind of cloud, with this kind of uncertainty to confirm someone with the suspicion that they could be an
iranians were. there was no need for us to approach it that way. they needed the sanctions relief more than anyone else. with north korea, if not the main reason why north koreans are coming to the table as they crushed the mouth, and kim jong un decided that they needed to pursue a different path quoted. not only for their people, how much kim jong un cares about his own people. harris: i think we have an indication. tell us exactly how that regime feels about his people. we are not in the dark about that. the president plans to meet one-on-one with the russian president vladimir putin on jul. one of the goals of that summit as you see on a committee where i would imagine you look at the meddling that they just perpetrated in our presidential election, and we are not going to get into investigations and all that but the actual meddling that the investigation shows,