they didn t come out with it. they said could be pertinent, they didn t say they are pertinent. i was a special prosecutor for a year investigating the corruption. i was an assistant da and i never and let me repeat this, i never ever would have released information about a candidate running for office 11 days before the election prior to the election. particularly when this investigation is obviously not going to be concluded before the election. they have been made by republicans all afternoon. peter king was a reasonable guy saying james comey must have felt this was really important and relevant or else he wouldn t have released it. the conclusions have been drawn and no way to defend themselves. this is conduct that boggles the mind. where do you come down on the
the investigation was rigged and he was saying it was greased to protect hillary clinton and now a very different message for the republicans and democrats as well. that doesn t surprise me. does it surprise you? you are not talking to me about that. i am fairly consistent and they like comey. unless you are a partisan or a flack, you will look at the guy the same way now as you looked at him in july. you are not going to change your view of his character because you don t like his latest decision. would you change your mind because you don t like their latest decision? in politics i have come to expect nothing will surprise me. they make character judgments and they came krooacross as a mf character for a long time. would you tell everybody about this? mike pence talks about the
there was a letter sent by james comb tow eight congressional republican chair men who he said they have uncovered and discovered e-mails that appear to be pertinent to that investigation of hillary clinton s e-mail server. the fbi is reviewing the e-mails to see if there is any classified information involved. that was what it was about in the first place. was it sent or received? he also said there is no time table right now and he doesn t know he said how long this review is going to take and also the newest development, the new york times reported and the nbc news confirmed that the fbi is looking at it and they stem from the investigation into anthony wiener. anthony wiener with the sexting case with his child. we also have this statement from
like a separate investigation. no, what donald trump said last night and today is a sentiment shared by millions of americans. you know it in their polling where people say they don t trust hillary clinton and don t think she is honest and trustworthy. she is compromised and all the attacks coming from camp clinton are displace said. imagine if he had not come if forward and sat on this and she was elect and he had to come forward. we are supposed to elect someone unqualified and find out after the election that there is no controversy swirling around her? i agree with the clinton campaign and they are asking them to come forward and tell americans exactly what this is all about. we the republicans and the trump
to potential hillary clinton? it s still the fact that the fbi director said no reasonable prosecutor would indict her and completely controverted under sworn testimony and i give him credit, he is not like the hillary clinton people to immunize himself against criminal repercussions. she said she had one device and there were 13. she said there was no classified information and he said there was. donald trump and so many mill yo yons of americans believe the fbi came to the wrong conclusion and let s not forget many clinton supporters and many people in the mainstream media were critical of the director at the time for having that press conference. they wanted to leave it at a statement and not protect the reputation and the integrity of the investigation.