living in a town filled with leaks and they haven t been plugged. there aren t many secrets in this town. my guess is what is said in that meeting will be made public eventually. from my standpoint what i hope will happen with the special counsel process. f.b.i. director mueller is probably the best choice you could have made. but i m hoping the former f.b.i. director really sticks to the first his first charge, which is investigating any links or coordination between the russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of president donald trump. what i don t want to see is an expanding fishing expedition. i don t want to see what happened in valerie plame where we knew up front who did reveal that and we had the investigation go on for years. let s get to the bottom of this. look to the senate intelligence committee conduct their investigation and issue their report. this is a serious matter. let s find out what russia did
white house is also said, well, some of the people weren t important, the defense went from they weren t involved to well, they re just rando volunteers. sure. it is the chairman if you re a campaign and paul manafort, national security adviser, and mike flynn, really it goes on and on. the idea that paul manafort and michael flynn were not important on the campaign is really quite laughable. and the longer this investigation go on, the more names that comeout. he said nobody, we alrea have a half dozen people associated with the trump campaign that have been linked to russia. and i think that s just the beginning. briefly from an investigative perspective, if somebody that you are investigating said that the person who used to be in charge of the campaign was unimportant in the campaign, how would you rate the credibility of that? i don t care. as an investigator, the politics have nothing to do with it, i m switzerland, i m going to look at the facts and if one fact leads me to
is that scenario something you learn about in police school? no absolutely not. all professional police officers will disavow any connection to that. that is not the way we train police officers. that is not the way we want them to perform. and, again, and i applaud everybody for saying that clearly. you know you have you have credibility when you admit your mistakes and as they said in north charleston when you re wrong, you re wrong. this officer from all appearances is wrong and let the investigation go on and let the process go on. certainly on his face right now, i don t see a justification. okay. so the very last graphic i m going to show you is you were talking about seeing this officer drop some sort of object next to the victim s body. at some point another officer comes to the scene. if we could put that very last graphic up that would be graphic number 4. so the other officer, i found this interesting, does not react
and criminal shawn, when did keeping the peace become pandering and when does pandering become the seeds of dissatisfaction in terms of the krinl nal justice but they haven t indicted him. how long did this investigation go on? there s procedure for everything. yeah, he does. if you have the attorney general of the united states and you, i m with you, wow. now, the federal government started that s different than the race being fl going to jail. they stepped aside when the state came in and tried the case. they didn t get the verdict and they spoke to 36 different witnesses and there was not a hint of riegsal bias?
and criminal shawn, when did keeping the peace become pandering and when does pandering become the seeds of dissatisfaction in terms of the krinl nal justice but they haven t indicted him. how long did this investigation go on? there s procedure for everything. yeah, he does. if you have the attorney general of the united states and you, i m with you, wow. now, the federal government started that s different than the race being fl going to jail. they stepped aside when the state came in and tried the case. they didn t get the verdict and they spoke to 36 different witnesses and there was not a hint of riegsal bias?