think this will lead to at least some second guessing i 2024 when we can guess that if the republican candidate i behind something similar wil allegations. you ve got this almost 800 billion dollars presumably mor than you will get with a smartmatic even a company as profitable a fox can just say that, what is one billion dollars betwee france i really agree with that. to emphasize that, i strongl agree. this is not going to change th nature of what fox news is but there is some deterren effect you, know first of all, they will not go on the air and defame - it s pretty clear, i would hope. i think you are right. that was always the case. but in the run up to 2024 this stuff will all surfac again. trump is going to say th primary is rigged if he loses state. he s going to say dominion voting machines or tabulatin
Transcripts for MSNBC All In With Chris Hayes 20240604 00:25:30 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
shootings in new york city are down more than 26% year over year that is really impressive. it s welcome and great homicide is down more than 11% this year. the facts no matter here for a least stefanik, of course. because there s something so cynical and gross because of the fox engage in his country. the most serious type of crime in this country s gun violence gun violence epidemic is something no other wealthy country has. most of the states with th worst rates of gun deaths ar ones where republicans control the state government but when the right talks about crime in this country, the tend to focus obsessively on visible examples of what you might call urban disorder. rarely bringing up the type of horrifying incident we saw i an alabama over the weekend, a small southern town, dadeville 32 people were injured, four were killed when a mas shooting broke out at a swee 16 party on saturday night you don t see them going dow to dadeville talking about how dadeville is an example of
possibly going to defend itself because the judge had really shut off every avenue of argumentation you could imagin fox news making. they were going to try to argu that they were reporting o newsworthy allegations by th president and his attorney the judge said he cannot d that did judge already rule that fo news aired defamator falsehoods the only thing we were arguing about was whether in airin those defamatory falsehoods, fox news raised to the standar of actual malice you heard the lawyer talkin about the repercussions. i think the point about th first amendment law is interesting. generally, from a lega standpoint, what is your tak away from the settlement look, you can quibble wit mr. that shackelford this wa in their self interest this was one of the very, if very rare cases in our socia history in which the publi interest -
the votes in new hampshire if he loses new hampshire, like, it s a lot of issue that s going to play on fox news in a way that there is some deterrent effect, harry, fro this settlement. i don t disagree. all the, the settlement amount itself, chris, it s a big check, but i don t think it could v been much less than that whatever deterrent effect it had, it already, i think, di have and you are right that nothing is going to penetrate the fo bubble there would ve been possibility in the way other large cases in american histor have done and maybe the januar 6th committee was aiming for this of establishing a socia fact in the broad middle not for all of a sudden fox to have the scales fall from thei eyes there are things that could ve happened, including a carefull crafted apology that will no now. it will just be a muddle and foxville go on with its weighs more easily than it would ve i it had been a blockbuster we