full investigation. he is the highest ranking military officials in the west. and not one of two things is true. milley is a dangerous preacher who can put our country in serious danger or woodward and costa are liars. and if woodward adds costa and the washington post are lying and slandering general milley because that would be slender, he will own the washington post and potentially probably a good chunk of it, not all of amazon considering jeff bezos owns both. after a massive defamation suit. i don t know the answer tonight. i know it is serious enough that it needs immediate attention. immediate appointment of a commission and we need immediate answers and the american people have a right to see all of those transcripts sooner than later. no problem releasing transcripts of donald trump office calls with foreign leaders, so that should not be a problem, right? woodward and costa are you cutie allegations that the reporting
and taking away the president s ability to do his job as commander-in-chief, one of those jobs would be perhaps to launch a nuclear weapon. he would then be guilty of the very definition of insurrection. that is the democrat s favorite word. and again, the president is the commander-in-chief. our constitution is clear. it authorizes the president and the president alone with that power and authority over our military. there is no constitutional authority granted to the chairman of the joint chiefs general milley. not anyone else but the president. our republic is designed to prevent apolitical a political coup. so what we are describing here is the constitutional crisis of the highest order, an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government, now an
not a single american died in the last year of the trump presidency, not one american citizen died and no american would have been left behind on your watch and donald trump s. i can say that also. let s talk about the hypotheticals and the allegations being made here. number one, the role that general milley might have had with other high ranking military officials to gain their loyalty that a decision must go through me. i don t see constitutionally he is induction of commitment it would go from the president to the secretary of defense and then it would make its way down. the call would be the wo wpresident s, not general milley s what is nancy pelosi s role in all of this? and number three, we both know russia, china, iran, north korea or hostile regimes. my question is, wouldn t that transcript exist if he in fact called china without permission of his own defense?tr secretary and made a deal that
remember, the democratic party start witness in the ukraine impeachment hopes. he is calling on millie to resign. tonight, as always, we won t grant the same presumption of innocence to milley that we would for anyone else. it has observed this program well over the many years we have done it 25 years here at fox, 33 years on radio. but that left and the media mob, a left to throw around the red insurrection, probably on the other channels that they talk about it almost every night. perplexed but now with one of the highest officials accused of plotting history on insurrection, perhaps in conjunction with some toast on some level with the speaker of the house to usurp a null and void the crystal clear constitutional role that the president has and the role defined the constitution for the president as commander-in-chief, many on the left, they are silent night, including joe biden. today nothing but praise for general milley.
i think you are right put in your bottom line that milley represents something that is not just contrary to our democracy, but contrary to our constitution and a danger to our nationalut security. i think there needs to be a thorough investigation and charges brought if there s evidence. sean: there needs to be a commission formed immediately. we need to get the transcripts. they had no problem releasing transcripts with donald trump and foreign leaders. they should not be hard to come by. we need to know what was said to his counterpart in china and did he promise to tip off a hostile regime, an enemy country, a few next is was going to engage in military activity that would be top-secret? we need to get to the bottom of that. did the also plot, plan and scheme to potential usurping of the president s constitutional authority. that is what it reads like.