To an end as he stated many times. We look forward to that happening. The president is not obstructing, hes fighting back. The president is stating his opinion. Hes stating it clearly. Hes certainly expressing the frustration he has with the level of corruption that weve seen from people like jim comey, peter strzok, andrew mccabe, theres a reason the president is angry. Frankly, most of america is angry as well. Theres no reason he shouldnt be able to voice that opinion. Once again as i stated earlier, the president stating his opinion. Its not an order. Hes been Crystal Clear how he feels about this investigation from the beginning. You said a moment ago the investigation itself is corrupt. The mueller investigation, you mentioned comey and strzok. The entire investigation based off dirty, discredited dossier that was paid for by an opposing campaign. The latest news from around the world with host Brooke Baldwin. At a public rally and yet people trying to yell over and defending the
few. the most compelling are, they haveis few. the most compelling are, they have is basically need time to prepare a defence. i suspect what they will say is, look, jack smith and the deferment ofjustice have been investigating this for three years, they had three years to pull together evidence, interview witnesses, review documents, review video tapes, all of that, you have to give us at least a year to counter all of that but to do our own diligence, our on investigation for i think that a from their own compelling argument. they made it a go they got three other cases at least going on at the same time, and you cannot inspect any, no defendant will let a candidate for president of the united states, to keep all of those balls up in the air and keep present in all these courtrooms, simultaneously across the country. they will have decent arguments for pushing things back. what they will have decent arguments for pushing things back. pushing things back. what do you think about p
we provided a ton of evidence that show willfulness. a matter of if there is evidence before you and potential tax crimes that exist, you should be able to follow the evidence, interview witnesses, do all the proper procedures. i understand this was a politically sensitive case. it was a matter of you can t do that. let s think about it and at the end of the day, we were not following the evidence we should have. rachel: i heard him on a podcast earlier, this case matters because everybody who has a case before the irs needs to be treated equally. our logical line of investigation, let s go here and there, there s another
interview witnesses. they were a full go. we have probable cause and move forward. suddenly it changes near the end. that i think is the key issue. bill: that was jim jordan. here is an excerpt from this whistleblower called whistleblower x is prepared to say today. hunter biden should have been charged with a tax felony and not only the tax misdemeanor charge prosecutors slow walked the investigation and put in place unnecessary approvals and roadblocks from effectively and efficiently investigating the case. hunter biden will be before a judge one week from today. and plead guilty to these two misdemeanor charges here. will anything today change his appearance in seven days in that courtroom? there is no way for us to know. i think it s important to note the whistleblowers goal in coming forward wasn t to change the outcome necessarily for any given individuals sentencing.
about ongoing investigations could violate statutory requirements or court orders, reveal road maps of our investigations, and interfere with the department s ability to gather facts, interview witnesses, and bring criminal prosecutions where warranted. earlier this month jordan demanded more information about the case from the doj including all records and communicatations connected to it. on the senate side the doj issued a let door the intelligence committee over the weekend writing it was working to determine what information could be shared about the contents of the classified records found in both president biden s and former president trump s possession. for the top lawmakers on the committee, though, democrat mark warner, and republican marco rubio, that update was deemed unhelpful. here s what they had to say about it yesterday. it is not it does not give us any additional guidance of when we re going to be able to fulfill our obligation.