and skies across the country supporting a familiar look, smoke from canada is drifting again. the right and dutiy to protect one another. did he act reasonably? none of us would ever want to find ourselfs in this situation. grounded to third, there it is! perfection for domingo german. an opportunity for a perfect game, i will remember it forever. a rare moment for the yankees to celebrate and now this. hunter biden not celebrating. he is said to be deposed today in a defamatory suit brought to the owner of the delaware repair shop where he left his infamous laptop. this comes as the irs makes claims about who decided whether or not the president s son would be charged with a crime. mark meredith joins us from the white house. good morning a lot to get to. the white house and the justice department are facing questions about how the government handled e their investigation into the first son. the whistle glour, gary shapley who is cooperating says he was prevent
biden s. they still think it was compromised somehow. so the fact that the bidens denied that this was his laptop for so long and now they re going to have to admit it in court today, i think it is ironic. what did you think of gary shapley s interview last night. we just heard it in that report. this is another example of the department of justice meddling to have a cover up. this is a cover up of public corruption at the highest level. when we brought in the national archives, they said the doj told them to stand down. we have fbi whistle-blowers that said they were told to stand down on this investigation of biden bribery. now you have two very credible
and then you put up that interview last night by rudy giuliani and say, who s lying? this is the reason they want to keep the trial within tightly-bound guardrails. if they talk about the facts that the house developed, they re not overwhelming, in part because administration witnesses didn t testify, but they can make the case that the house fell short and it does not rise to the level of conviction. glenn, would you want rudy giuliani to testify or not? not in my defense. i would love to cross-examine him if he were an adverse witness, that would be great. but i do not think you re going to see anybody ask him to raise his right hand, swear an oath to tell the truth, and then start answering questions. i still got to think that at some point the justice department says, hang on there, we re in the middle of something with him and that s when this stuff starts getting really interesting. glenn kirchner, thank you, sir, for your expertise. betg betsy, joel, and michael, you guy
accept responsibility, that s something he is doing now. that reflects on his judgment right now. let s snapshot this. i think there s a critical point here. the president is talking about referring to something that happened 35, 36 years ago. in the past week or so the story has changed. it is not just whether someone was touched inappropriately more than three decades ago. it is whether a potential supreme court justice is honest today. when he went on tv last night, i m sitting back there saying, why are you doing this? you are throwing out red meat for people who can poke holes in every bit of your presentation and say, that s not the high school that we went to and that s not the high school student we saw. so that s the question about why not just be more honest about mistakes you may have made when you were younger? remember, george bush, you know, said you know, apologized for mistakes he made when he was drinking too much. so i don t understand why you wouldn t be more h
are saying yes. judge kavanaugh went on fox news last night, as you know, to deny the allegations. but the way kavanaugh portrays himself is clearly very different from the picture we are getting from some others, including from his own yearbook, his high school yearbook, from some of his own classmates at yale university, a roommate described him, as you point out, as aggressive and blej rent quote, aggressive and belligerent drinking. what do you make of that? it comes back to the fact that there s a portrait that is emerging of an individual who did not treat women well. you mentioned the yearbook. we ve heard about the reputation of his fraternity. we ve heard from two women directly affected. we ve heard that there are others that michael avenatti is ready to bring forward. we ve heard from the freshman roommate. this is why you have an fbi investigation. this is not a criminal investigation. this is a background investigation, and it is standard that when new information