importance. they have not leaked anything. if it s not based on a court filing from the mueller report or team i give it less credibility. the washington post story said the president on several occasions concealed the details of his face-to-face encounters with putin. he took notes from his own interrupter. they didn t discuss what inspired. that s unusual but how damaging is it? it s damaging from a media narrative for this reason. trump said there has been no collusion and that s what mainstream media would like to attach him to but having notes for the meetings. we don t want everything released to the media. if we wants to help himself he
think any other president in modern history if ever. this was a standard practice that he did with other world leaders? so one thing that wasn t captures in there was the way i phrased that question was does the president always destroy these notes or tapes. that holds out the possibility that they still exist in the president s personal files. it is a remarkable development. lawyers for the house foreign affairs and house committees are evaluated legal options for subpoenaing the translator and interrupter who was in the room in trump s private meeting with vladimir putin in hamburg. that comes after the washington post laid out the extraordinary actio
and testify before. if they took that extraordinary step, one of the questions you would ask the interrupter is what did putin say that the president found so persuasive that he was able to come out later and say that putin denies he interfered in our election and i don t see why they would. he either had a very persuasive argument or b the president is easily persuaded. the evidence is over wheming. so that would be the first question that i would ask an interpreter if one was available. it it is crucial importance that we get answers to some of these things. i know it is not something we always have access two, but this one is worry someone. thank you for your analysis. i want to even side why it is
news story they are not of any importance. they have not leaked anything. if it s not based on a court filing from the mueller report or team i give it less credibility. the washington post story said the president on several occasions concealed the details of his face-to-face encounters with putin. he took notes from his own interrupter. they didn t discuss what inspired. that s unusual but how damaging is it? it s damaging from a media narrative for this reason. trump said there has been no collusion and that s what mainstream media would like to attach him to but having notes for the meetings. we don t want everything released to the media. if we wants to help himself he
thought that arnold schwarzenegger s performance in kindergarten cop war the apott owes sis of good acting. > steve a little harsh but that s his opinion. brian: so i know corey booker but this is the not the corey booker i know. they are running for president. ainsley: i think they are all vying for running for president. day one kamala harris one sentence in the middle of grassley s sentence she interrupts. she wants to be the first one to notice to be interrupter. and corey booker started to interrupt. they all want to be on the ticket. steve: just to recap how things ran on wednesday it was all about asking for a delay of game. let s adjourn. yesterday it was all about the theatrics of the classified documents that were not actually classified. ainsley: all for nothing. brian: could be a committee vote as early as next week and they should be wrapping um testimony today. i m sure they will have more documents and more questions