this nominee was being completely transparent about her role and offering up the information for us to be able to make an informed decision about her nomination. you said that she was remarkably consistent with what she said during the open hearing. are you saying you learned nothing more on her opinions on torture or more on her background in a closed hearing? i think that s correct. i mean this is someone who s very good at giving long legalese answers but avoiding the fundamentals of just saying yes or no to whether or not torture is consistent with american values. and i was looking for the buck stops here sort of approach to this, and instead we got these sort of long-winded legalistic answers to some very fundamentally basic moral questions. the senate s report on cia s enhanced interrogation use of torture found much more than just waterboarding.
what she did was appalling in terms of how she treated here human being. the other woman, and how one woman talking to another woman is outrageous. what was shocking to me the woman behind the attendant warned her there was a surveillance camera up there and she kept on going. it was nasty. no two ways about it. it did make all of us cringe. i think though that we don t know the full circumstances. we don t know the scale of the provocation beyond the camera. one thing is for sure, it was a painful video. perhaps that is something we can release to guantanamo bay for interrogation use. got to leave it there. have a great weekend. thank you. calorie charts are fairly common in restaurants now. nutritional info could soon spread to what you are drinking? oh. adam housley live in napa of all places. lucky.