good evening, bret. once again republicans called on the secretary of state to resign but in a shift from yesterday s house hearing, he wasn t getting much love from democrats either. doing the right thing in the wrong way ends up being the wrong thing. democratic chairman of the senate foreign relations committee robert menendez set the tone for what turned out to be three hours of intense questioning and scolding of secretary of state antony blinken over the withdrawal from afghanistan. we realize this is a complete debacle. this sant failure of intelligence. this is a failure of policy and planning. this is a puppeteer act if you would and we need to know who is in charge and who is making these decisions. committee democrats deflected, letting the secretary explain how we got here over the last 20 years. and pointed fingers at the trump administration. republicans handled the interrogating. senator rand paul who has been pushing for years to leave afghanistan took iss
NIA is investigating the case
Suspended cop of Mumbai police force Sachin Vaze is arrested for his involvement in planting the explosives
It s been five days since the suspended Mumbai police cop Sachin Vaze was questioned by NIA but still, NIA doesn t have any clue why Sachin Vaze planed the Gelatin-laden Scorpio outside Antilia. As per the NIA sources, Sachin Vaze has not uttered a word about the motive.
He has said nothing about the conspiracy in his interrogation till date. Vaze hasn t taken names of any other co-conspirator or co-accused in his interrogation till now. In this case, NIA so far has evidences to link the conspiracy to Waze, but the motive is still unclear to the agency.
for being here. thank you. let me get your reaction to his reporting of congressman jordan, jim jordan and mark meadows. a advising the president coming to what s taking place in the depositions behind closed doors. it is not a closed process because the republicans have been there. jordan, me dos have been there. > right. that you are immediate counsel has been there. interrogating, questioning the witnesses. this is an investigation process and this should be a in a confined environment because first and foremost we want to protect the witnesses, we want to make sure that any future witnesses not intimidated. we want to make sure that witnesses don t coordinate with each other. like asking from the white house side, almost like asking a prosecutor or a d.a. a suspect asking the d.a. to control the investigation and to have influence over the investigation. we are in an investigation process. the constitution gives us sole power of impeachment, over 300
he actually met with mr. schiff. they have denied that but, the aide did share the story with mr. schiff and then when he goes on tv and says we, it sounds like he and the committee. but he just meant he personally did not speak to the whistleblower. this goes to what we were just talking about which is the trajectory of you who this is all playing out. let me preface this by saying i actually testified before this committee and i thought that schiff, of all the democrats who asked me questions, he was clearly the most able lawyer. he is clearly, you know, he is not a dumb guy. he is very good at the nuts and bolts stuff of lawyering and interrogating. but he was kind of moved in here and jerry nadler was elbowed aside to become the face of the impeachment project in the house. and i think the longer you look at this, i don t think his credibility is going to be able to stand up to the job. and it may just be that if