he put out about a computer search never brought up at the trial. we were waiting for the state to bring it up and when they didn t we were shocked. only looked at the internet explorer search engine. they missed looked at another one, firefox. jose knew there was a search for full proof suffocation. a search made on june 16th, 2008. the same day kaylee anthony vanished. how do you think that evidence might have changed things at trial? it would have been a powerful piece of evidence firefighter the state. if that came out in the trial, you might have had a different outcome. one more piece of evidence or
eiglarsh. it s incredible to me. the anthony home computer only searched the internet explorer search engine and didn t look at this fire fox. you know how you click on the various icons. he only searched the one and not the other one. the other one thanks to a news organization that got it hand on it and reviewed the record saw someone in the anthony home searched foolproof suffocation on the day she went missing. they missed 1,200 other messages. it was the defense was able to find it before they went to trial. but of course the defense doesn t have to give that over to the prosecution it was as simple as typing in suffocating versus suffocation. it was an example of gross error