examples liz cheney provided on tuesday were both directed at cassidy hutchinson, their star witness. we have learned that at least one of those examples was delivered through an interneed yar of mark meadows. mark meadows, through his spokesperson ben williamson said they denied that meadows or anyone in his orbit made any attempt to influence hutchinson or her testimony, but this is something the committee is keeping a close eye on. there s a report in the new york times this week that outlines how any of these witnesses, their lawyers are being paid for by organizations with close ties to the former president. the committee is going to work very hard to make sure there s no undue influence in this testimony. they view that to be a veers problem. keep in mind, if they find direct evidence that witnesses were targeted and sbim kated with the express purpose of not
federal felony of witness tampering and witness intimidation under 18 u.s. codes section 15-12 b, that is sentenced to something like 20 years, 30 years in prison. and it s serious, and it really puts a special light on the courageous testimony of this young woman. she is under threats. they re implicit. they re like, oh, what a nice little dog you have there. they are essentially god father four. i don t know which role marlin brandow would play, whether he would be the president or mark meadows, but this is serious stuff. she clearly has every incentive to tell the truth because instead of being rewarded for what she s saying, she s being threatened, and she s saying it