internationalists lobbyists essentially, that travels around the world meeting with parliament in other countries trying to get those other countries to pass super antigay laws. so, when you are mitt romney and donate money to this organization because you want to support their fight against gay people getting married in california or whatever, don t be fooled by the word national being in the name. they really are international now. if you are donating money to the national organization for marriage, you are also supporting their fight to get guys on the street in russia arrested because of a sign they re holding that says gay people are okay. that is what the national organization for marriage has been spending its american donation doing. that is what their paid staffers
and on the other hand, our country is the source of antigay internationalists lobbyists essentially, that travels around the world meeting with parliament in other countries trying to get those other countries to pass super antigay laws. so, when you are mitt romney and donate money to this organization because you want to support their fight against gay people in california or whatever. don t be fooled by the word national being in the name. they really are international now. if you are donating money to the national organization for marriage, you are also supporting their fight to get guys on the street in russia arrested because of a sign they re holding that says gay people are okay. that is what the national organization for marriage has been spending its american donation doing. that is what their paid staffers spend their money on.
the woodwork. live coverage of operation turkey freedom. did you spot weld this, mom? that is just pathetic. and there s more. this is a sham from beginning to end. i have my critics, obviously. it s the worst deal since munich. munich is a stupid analogy. is it me or do the president s comments sound eerily similar to what envelope chamberlain said back in 1938. this is sort of like winston churchill. we re not talking about czechoslovakia in 1938. only a fool goes to war if he or she doesn t have to. it s always going to be messy. let s get right to our panel. joining us now, democratic strategist, angela rye. y gore voluntarily ski of think progress.org and josh barrow. listening to that montage, the difference between now and 2003 is that the public is four square on the side of liberal internationalists this time.
administration on this deal on a very short leash with congress. you have internationalists that like this idea and view that through the prix of what this means historically. if you look at the relationship between the u.s. and iran, it s been quite tu multiuous for the last 30 years or so. if they if it goes well, it will be the single greatest achievement of the obama presidency. we always knew republicans would look at this deal and be skeptical of it mainly because most of them are ar dent supporters of israel and have close ties with israeli security and want that to continue. what s interesting with chuck schumer and bob menendez, i think it s possible to see tougher sanctions and that puts president obama in a difficult situation and could be the first veto of his administration, can harry reid hold off tougher sanctions in the next six months? that s going to be a very
action. but you have rand paul who s very popular among potential 2016 candidate taking the very opposite position. who s got the upper hand among the republicans? i think the internationalists do if and you re one of them. yeah, but if we had a president who we could trust out more to carry out the agenda which i do not believe this president has done. rand paul does not have that much support. if you really break down, there are five senators that agree with rand paul. the wavering republicans he s wavering. why is he wavering? because the administration is so fumbled everything over the last weeks or last couple of years that he s deeply doubtful this administration will competently carry out this mission and achieve a real purpose. having said that, i think a lot of republicans will decide for all their doubts with the