Production of a half Million Barrels a day by the tomb of president penas end of term and then maybe a Million Dollars a day by 2025. So thats a conservative number in terms of the Resource Base and in terms of what might be possible. Just looking across the divide where technically recoverable resources on the mexican side exceed those on the u. S. Side and the eagleford would not take much if this were the United States to get on shore conventional nonconventional production up to a half Million Barrels a day let alone whatever might be happening on the conventional side. Canadian production is likely to continue. These quasiofficial numbers based on the cap. So current production in canada is roughly three and a half Million Barrels a day. And we can kind of readily project five Million Barrels a day adjusted for where the price of oil may be but theres going to be an uplift as canadian oil reaches water borne markets in terms of the net back price to the well head, even if global p
With other companies. But its a very important but. But in a level playing field, and its there where the fact that they not took pemex out of the budget, and the i would say excessive intrusion of the treasury in many of the decisions of pemex, trace from because some of those middle layers and high layers, are completely unhappy with that you see. Okay. You want and we want pemex to compete, let us compete. But do not put us in an unlevel playing field. If you if youre really make an assessment, i think that the big loser of the reform as it is is pemex. Paradoxically, because one would say that within the mind of the government strategically thinking they need to understand that they need pemex to be the dominant company for quite some time, some years, for the country and the sector to keep moving ahead. There is the other thing is impossible to imagine from day one to day two and the monopolys gone and Everything Else is done by somebody by somebody else. So, and that is not, in m
To meaningfully deescalate the crisis and provide an opportunity to move forward diplomatically. It has to recognize the results of the election and engage directly with the government of ukraine. It needs to completely withdraw its military forces from the border area, stop the flow of militants and weapons across the border, exercise influence among armed separatists, renounce violence, resolve their differences peacefully and, of course, in terms of what it cant do, no military intervention. If russia takes these steps its equally important that ukraine respond in an appropriate manner. The president elect has a plan for what he calls peace, unity, and reform. It includes things like pursuing the national dialogue, a ceasefire, decentralization, amnesty for those who put down their weapons and drawing separatists into the political process. Ukraine should pursue those steps. It should avoid having to pursue martial law, disproportionate use of force, or fullscale Counterterrorism Op
Up next on c span 3, a hearing on Port Security. After that, senator al franken introduces legislation that taelts to prevent companies and government organizations from tracking a persons location on their smart phones wow their consent. Later, a forum on Cyber Security from bloomberg government. Discusses syria civil war. The look at the growing phenomenon of children illegally entering the u. S. Without their parents. Well talk to usa today reporter alan gomez. U. S. Customs and Transportation Security Administration officials testified about Port Security issues, including cargo screening. The Senate Homeland Security Committee is chaired by senator tom carper of delaware. Good morning, everyone. Were happy you to welcome you today and thank you for joining us. Dr. Coburn ive called this hearing, this is a hearing he has a whole lot of interest in, i have two, but its a shared a shared interest. We want to take a look at the current state of Port Security, and these United States o
And the down side of that is that most probably there will be a contamination of the discussion because the discussions of these are transnationals and they will clearly raise the issues. Its already starting an interesting debate about those issues. But those are the ones that im not talking about the air, thats a different emissions of co 2 or Something Like that, thats different. Im talking about more the water issues. Weve got three more questions, i think thats going to have to wrap it up because i know two of our speakers have tight travel schedules. One and two more over here. Thank you very much for your presentations. Im from georgetown university. There have been many comments about the excess of optimism in the goals and benefits from the Energy Reform recently. The oxford incident which i believe mr. Haas is somewhat familiar because it was a paper recently released that was highlighting the lack of services for the water exploration, that the new fields would hardly offset