Terrorism, we have assembled a panel of leading experts to discuss these issues which include, by the way three generals with seven stars between them. Coming to moderate the panel is jerry who was one of the original members of the delta force and commanded all of the armys green berets. Today we are proud to announce he served as the Vice President of the Research Council. Ladies and gentlemen as these men come to the stage would do not just welcome them but also thank them for their service to the United States of america. [applause] thank you all very much. Please be seated. My name is jerry boykin. Tony is a marine and i normally start my presentation with a range of. Having said that, general conway is a retired commandant of the marine corps, so im going to skip that out of fear for my life. [laughter] we are going to go right into it. Listen i know as americans we are all concerned about what we see today unfolding across the globe with the chaos that we see with the ebola is r
Propellant. Wouldnt that blowup . A culprit is a chemical engineer working at the plant. The answer was, not if it stays in the right phase. Okay. In addition the media reported various problems at the takata plant in 2001. Secret air bag test in 2004 so why didnt takata take action on any of these concerns regarding the use of Ammonium Nitrate . Guest let me briefly explain about that. Ammonium nitrate there are several vintages using it. Also to the end users also. But because of the Chemical Properties it is sensitive to moisture. And if not well controlled to administer the program. They performed or they will not perform as designed and of course, that could influence the combustion. But talk about two when knowledge Ammonium Nitrate stays stable during the process and also in the environment. So if we produce that which is under control that will be stable. The law at the end with some occasion. Mr. Shimizu i did not interrupt you to give you every opportunity to answer the quest
The final elements of a deal are unknown. Its very hard to predict at this stage but however i think theres widespread agreement among u. S. Nuclear experts that the general contours of a good deal with established limits on irans programs that, taken together, would limit the size of the stockpile of enriched uranium at the number of centrifuges that iran could keep to ensure that this combination would leave iran approximately one year away from being able to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a bomb. It would also be modifications to the fordow facility into a research into the site and modifications to the arak heavywater reactor to make sure it is no longer capable to produce the amount of plutonium necessary to make a nuclear weapon. In addition to these account for proliferation benefits, preventing and Iran Nuclear Weapon would also result in another key benefit, the heading off of the regional arms race. It also would serve to strengthen the global nonproliferation sys
Put another level of protection there. I want you to do to hops until theres a connection. We are not authorized now to follow the string as we used to be able to do. In terms of the metadata of those are probably the biggest changes we have dealt with. In addition we have provided broad guidance in the form of an unclassified document that the government has generated which in a very public unclassified way outlines the general principles we want to make sure we apply in conducting intelligence at the nsa so we are putting those principles in place. In addition we have completed over the course of the last 15 months or so a fundamental review of everything that nsa does and what we collect against. That has all been reviewed to ensure we are comfortable from a policy perspective and what we are doing. Basically what the admiral said is in erbil her bill that the senate unfortunately did not take up. We look forward to putting it together. As quickly and this is so important. There was
Weve already been directed to use that model. We now have to go to the court to access the data. Is the government no longer collecting located . The data continues to be provided to us. Now to access the data we have to go to the court to get permission to access the data. Why continue to gather the data is both administration and the and i dont think this is the best approach to . Guess im confused because i dont think ive heard the president or the di said access to the data is not a value. I think what ive heard is the question gets to be who should hold the data it the president directed in his remarks will continue to implement the program right now while Congress Works to how well make longterm changes. We will do that on a 90 day interval. So every 90 days we have to go back and ask for continued permission. One last comment. I know amount of time. If the administration believes, and understand that they do, that the better model is to go to a paradigm where Companies Hold onto