That many people are appalled to see that graffiti but i think that images such as george floyd getting the life choked out of him or even the flash bangs and rylan that weve seen at these protests as much more appalling than any graffiti that my occur at a protest and i also think it is a very small amount of individuals who may do that graffiti and it does not make sense in a country those opposed to be a free country that they would be deploying indiscriminate weapons against entire nonviolent crowds just because of the actions of some small amount of individuals while the nato nations are supposed to i dont know media in countries that washington may see as enemies the pictures of had to be on the internet mainly theyre not headlining the news what have you witnessed and what have you heard from the street level actions of Police Involved in because weve been seeing what seem to be u. S. Federal forces attacking protesters on the ground amidst clouds of tear gas. I think what youre
Institute for International Public affairs. Welcome to the special talk on a angernomics with my friend and coauthor. We are joined here today by mark, the director of the institute road center for International Economics and financing also the mark rhodes professor of International Economics and professor of Political Science and International Public affairs. Mark and i are going to chat for 20 to 25 minutes or so then we would love to take questions from the wall i you all in the. We have a lot of question we will put the trash order and go right to the questions. For those of you joining us on zoom it would be great if you could write your questions in the qanda box and for those of you joining on youtube, write your questions in the Comment Section and those will get to us. Please start writing them now especially if youve already had the pleasure and privilege of reading the angernomics. Lets get started. I loved this book. Its really provocative and fascinating. You mention in th
Accompanied by increases in stress, anxiety e and anger. Welcome. Im ed steinfeld, welcome to this special book talk on angrynomics, a new and really timely work by my friend mark blyth and his coor author. Were joined here today coauthor, were joined by mark, the william r. Rhodes professor of International Economics and professor of Political Science at international and public affairs. Mark and i are going to chat for 20 or 25 minutes or so, but then we would love to take questions if you all in the audience. In fact, if you have a lot of questions, well cut our chat shorter, and well go right to your questions. Those of you joining us via zoom, it would be great if you could write your questions in the q and a box, the q and a window, and well monitor those. And for those of you joining via youtube live, just write your questions in the comment section. Those questions will get to us. And please start writing those questions now, especially if youve already had the pleasure and pri
Patient without any of the ties to china had been diagnosed. That is a first. It is a suggestion this virus might be in wider circulation. The test that has been out there, they have not been able to get this working in many places. The cdc will allow it to be modified so more state and local Public Health labs can do that type of work when someone has symptoms that might be this virus. You want to start doing that brought surveillance, looking for patient you might not find otherwise. David we saw china their methodology two or three times. Is there any chance the change could get false positives and contaminate the data . Drew the worry with tests like this is you want to be accurate. You want to know that when you say someone has a disease, they do have it. The way the current test works is it looks at the genetic material of the virus and tested three different ways. If all three of those are positive, that is a positive test. You can take down the number of steps. You may lose som