Hunter and james biden recently. But our story is not about them tonight, as shocking as some of the details are. The story were about to tell you is about joe biden, the man who days from now could be elected president of the United States. Joe biden, and we can tell you this with certainity, has direct personal involvement with his familys Business Dealings in Communist China and likely in other countries as well. The former Vice President of course has vehemently denied that. He is lying. Tonight we can prove that. Before we begin, a word about Tony Bobulinski. Bobulinski is not a conventional whistleblower. He has no political agenda, to the extent he supported candidates in the past, hes given exclusively to democrats. Nor is he seeking money from this story, this is not a shakedown of the buy dense or anyone else. Bobulinski is already rich, significantly rich. He is a significant figure in american finance. And thats exactly why the biden family sought him out in the first place
Page, facebook. Com book tv. Book tv on cspan2, television for serious readers. Next, a discussion on Current Court cases that are challenging the constitutionality of union thieves regardless of Union Membership. Speakers involve the lead plaintiff in a Supreme Court case that resulted in a four for ruling as well as attorneys involved in two related cases that the High Court May hear. This is one hour. Welcome to the Heritage Foundation and welcome to those who joined us on our heritage. Org website as well cspan networks. To those in house, we ask a courtesy to see that our mobile devices are silenced or turned off and those watching online, you are welcome to send questions or comments at any time by emailing speaker heritage. Org. We will post the program on the heritage homepage for everyones future reference as well. Leading our discussion is david. He is the Senior Research fellow for labor market and trade. He has taught economics at James Madison university from 1984 until 20
It is a case that hes gone beyond anything thats acceptable. The question is, can you follow the path of what jessica was raising. Is the fatigue and the sense of threat from isis enough to create some kind of convergence there. I dont know. The short answer is i dont know the answer. Im a big believer this also goes back to one of the points that sam used to also raise. If theres one thing that guided sam more than anything else, it was that he said, dont fall in love with your own ideas. And if you think youre right, thats fine. But why dont you test your ideas . What do you lose if you test your ideas . The short answer is, you dont lose a lot. So id be quite open to testing certain things, but i also know that if it looks like we shouldnt assume necessarily that having the sunnis with us is a given if it looks like were drawing too close to the iranians, which has clearly been a sensitivity for the obama administration. If we want sunni tribes, by the way, not just in iraq but in s
Chinese i8 here on the ground. So where do we go from here . And i will conclude on these remarks. In the centrality of this relationship, i believe both governments in the region more broadly because of the centrality of the relationship to the region to biters to build the and the rest of the world as well as the move into the unfolding decades at the new century. The chinau. S. Relationship is a new narrative, a common narrative and here i dont simply speak in terms of some sort of Foreign Policy utopianism or some academic seminar. That is not helpful. I think you need a framework which somehow, someway with 158 es about a new type of great relationship. If you understand why president sheikh put that forward, is how you construct a relationship, which doesnt replicate the inevitability of conflict is received in the history of great powers before. Beyond that, it is basically a headline and an idea, a line. It is a sentence. If you go to chinese think tank land, as i do very often
Reform, domestically opening to the outside World International ly. Then its going to be a long process. So he used his marvelous analogy which is you cross the river steps feeling the stones step by step. [ speaking chinese ] i think we also need to have that concept alive in our minds about how you can possibly engineer that incremental trust building exercise between china and the United States as well. Step by step but knowing in fact that there is a destination called a common future. For our chinese friends here in the audience today, if you talk about realism, [ chinese word ] means something in the context. There are positive terms in the chinese context. [ chinese word ] or [ chinese word ] international and Global Public goods means something in the chinese discourse. So to frame a common vision, to frame a common concept but not to leave it at a level of political theory, but to then have an operational dimension which can be put into practice by regular symmetry by the two