do? they should allow these soldiers to be armed. it s an absurd policy. imagine in my time as a secret service agent or new york city police officer, going interest work at the white house and being asked to disarm or walking into a precinct and being asked to disarm and take off your weapon. these are trained soldiers, patriotic men and women who serve, and this is very important here. it s time time is the attackers friend and law enforcement s enemy. the more time they have these active shooter attacks, they last on average three minutes you know how many people are killed in these three minutes? five. if you could stop that within 30 seconds because someone else was armed and trained, you could save four lives just paced on the data alone. you know, the argument against that, as you have known and heard before, is that then if you have a bunch of ivan lopezs on the same day and they re all armed, it could make things a whole lot worse.
you in here. you sit there. and i am sitting here listenning. yeah, no, i think john is right and the concentration on making quarterly numbers and by corporation is skewed in the wrong way. there are stakeholders out there who are part of the community. it is not necessarily the part of the corporation and their penalty to do so. but the reason that all of this occurred and bill clinton did not talk about it, we have allowed in this country major corporations to get big, big has strangled the competition . competition is what brings the best price and product . as a consequence of ignoring that, then all of those other interest work . customers and et cetera become part of that. if the competition was there. you wouldn t have to worry