The International Criminal court. 6 arrest warrants for the countrys top officials over the war in gaza. And it is the 1st day since the political powers of ukrainian liter. Vladimir zalinski officially expired as he refuses to hold elections of siding martial law in the country. The live in moscow on rachel ruble. Youre watching archie international. A. Ron has entered 5 days of morning after the countrys president and foreign minister died in a Helicopter Crash arabians have gathered for the funeral ceremony of their countries to senior officials, which will last for 3 days and take place in several cities across the wrong crowd of people have packed into mosques to pay for those who perished. The bodies of the writing, president foreign minister and other officials and stuff have been transported to, to breeze the capital city of a rons easter as east as or by john province. Where were the helicopter went down on sunday . Well, its a ron, looks into the cause of the fatal crash. New
I dont know how many times ms. Jordan has recused herself as a board member. I know that supervisor avalos asked for that information a few days ago. This chronicle article referenced other allegations. I dont really have any information to verify that or speak to it. And i know that for elected officials and others, the section 1090 of the government codes requires limitations. Section 1090 would apply to a commissioner. The political reform act would require her to recuse herself if shes making a decision in her role as a board member that would impact her own financial holdings. An as always, my office works with every board member who want to figure out when to recuse themselves. I know there are times when recusal may be necessary for any of us, but many times when a recusal could invalidate the decision of the agency, is there that risk here . The law that you referenced, Government Code Section 1090 is the law that sometimes requires commissioners to step down. It would only req
The supervisor said i want to get a lot of money. So do i. Thousands of city workers signed petitions saying they dont want their what the city workers think and i think thats a statement really of the problem that we have here. The city workers retirees an active city workers have a right to have a pension fund that is going to be secure and theyre very concerned that proposals to turn it into hedge funds will put their pensions in jeopardy and the fact that you have somebody who sells Pension Funds, who invests in Pension Funds and is on the board and youre going to be reappointing this person to a five year term, what does that tell me an otherwise city workers . That you would have somebody that has a personal conflict of information on the pension board, whos questioning were having a trial. Ed lee was informing about this conflict of interest before he reappointed here and he continued to reappoint her. That tell ls me this mayor is not concerned about the retirees and active wor
Ticking and if the board rejects it the appointee loses the seat. It understand it doesnt its counterintuitive, but thats the way the charter raze. Reads. In this case the special meeting on january 7, but that would be your last day. Now, there have a number of allegations made in terms of non compliance with ethical requirements and we heard free the retirement board, sort of their at least the executive directors view as to the question of incompatible activities. Does the City Attorneys Office have an opinion as to whether or not this individual has complied with all the ethical requirements under state law . I can only speak to what i know based on the public filings and conversation with ms. Jordan. As supervisor avalos mentioned, the executive director of the retirement board received a complaint that ms. Jordan had accepted an investment while a member of the retirement board where the company had granted her the ability to invest even though her amount was below the threshold.
The connection theyre trying to make here is that wendy paskinjordan has been a barrier to the Due Diligence of the board finding out whether or not they are sitting on significant carbon risk. I would say that its up to this board here to up hold the integrity of its board through this. And theres a difference between intent and action. Theyre very separate things and although intentd is significant the action is without a doubt where the rule was broken. So when funds were traded after ms. Paskinjordan was on the board that seems like a very strong indicator for an ethics violation and this is the opportunity to keep the first board at the highest caliber business examining this further. Thank you. Hello, im a San Francisco resident and member of fossil free San Francisco as well. I think the previous comments, i have heard an explicit call that she not be reappointed and they were basically giving their reasons why they dont think she is adequately representing her fiduciary duty on