ex-president it is explosive reporting from the washington post. there s this saying when it comes to donald trump and his slogan, remember the one on the hats, make america great again, that what maga said make attorneys get attorneys. the late breaking news from the washington post proves this case that now donald trump s attorneys appear to be in special counsel jack smith s cross hairs including some of the most notorious ones. federal prosecutors investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 election have asked witnesses extension sieve questions about the actions of rudy giuliani, including where he got his information about alleged fraud, what he did in the days around january 6th and what he knew about the actions coming that day. people who have appeared in front of the grand jury say. investigators looking into classified documents pertaining to mar-a-lago have sought testimony from another trump lawyer, ben cork ran saying there is evidence that the former president u
instigation of terrorism. more important to get it right though. and i think this whole reporting that jackie has on lawyers being approached, looked at, talked to as opposed to the trump spokesperson who today said oh, this is proof they have a weak case, i see it differently. i see this as prove that jack smith is absolutely taking a broad approach, no stone unturned, and is unafraid to go into some very delicate legal areas that look into common interest privilege, attorney-client privilege. i think he couldn t care less. he s going to go where the facts go. i think as andrew said, nobody does this willy-nilly. i ve never seen a case that goes, we have nothing. why don t we try to jam up lawyers. no one does that. you do it only when you have an indication that there s some criminality involved that touches on the lawyers and that s what i think jack smith believes he has. frank, to your point, what s
Parties to a lawsuit often find themselves on the "same side of the courtroom" as other entities or individuals. In these instances, where a party is one of multiple (or many).
through your attorney to othert been protected by common interest privilege. instead, he s going out of his way to talk to people in the trump administration about what? like what are they talking about? are they talking about a pardon? are they talking about secrets that they didn t want the attorneys to know? you know, that is the obvious implication to me. so there s a lot of interesting questions raised here as to what he s talking about and why. gentlemen, thank you. have a good weekend. i appreciate it. you too. filings today giving greater detail about the trump campaign s links to russia. a big question now, what will the incoming congress do about it? we re going to talk to a member of the house intelligence committee next.
been protected by common interest privilege. instead, he s going out of his way to talk to people in the trump administration about what? like what are they talking about? are they talking about a pardon? are they talking about secrets that they didn t want the attorneys to know? you know, that is the obvious implication to me. so there s a lot of interesting questions raised here as to what he s talking about and why. gentlemen, thank you. have a good weekend. i appreciate it. you too. filings today giving greater detail about the trump campaign s links to russia. a big question now, what will the incoming congress do about it? we re going to talk to a member of the house intelligence committee next.