The ship could interdict enemy fleets on the high seas, particularly the Soviet Navy’s Kirov-class nuclear-powered battlecruisers that were then under construction at the Leningrad shipyards.
Ultimately, the Iowa-class battleships never received the overhaul necessary to become the “battle-carriers” once dreamed up by the Reagan administration. Today, all four vessels are relegated to museum duty.
One of the most dim-witted battleship conversation ideas was the battlecarrier – which could have seen the U.S. Navy's battleships modified into hybrid aircraft carriers.
Why Didn t Reagan Merge the Aircraft Carrier and Battleship? nationalinterest.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from nationalinterest.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Reagan s Naval Idea Would Have Scared the Soviets Straight
It would have been an expensive, and not necessarily effective, endeavor. (Although it would have looked pretty cool).
Key point: In place of the number three turret would be an extraordinary set of armaments.
In the early 1980s, the Reagan Administration was looking to fund high visibility defense programs. Reagan had been elected on a platform of rebuilding the armed services after the “hollowing out” of the early 1970s.
One example was the reactivation of four World War II-era Iowa-class battleships, which started in 1982. Each of the four ships, Iowa, Missouri, New Jersey and Wisconsin was refurbished, their sixteen and five-inch guns brought back online. Each battleship was also equipped with sixteen Harpoon anti-ship missiles, thirtytwo Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles and four Phalanx close-in weapon systems (CIWS) for defense.