getting something. he s getting paid somehow. if he s selling his access to being part of trump world to make money, then maybe what he really is worried about is whatever his personal business dealings are. that s the problem, right? also, remember this whole money laundering thing is a big issue for trump. all of these connections, these interconnections between him and these folks, iranian revolutionary guard, one of the men supposedly a money launder, now where cohen was actually connected was he is connected to these things that are happening, trump s soho, the connections there. trump soho, the trump tower moscow. but he s also paying the woman who got the abortion and that s related to elliott broidy who s also connected to this attempt to uae. you have a lot of people selling
home, careful to avoid ice that has been slowly melting the last two years. this place may seem far away, but it turns out, it s closer to home than any of us may have realized. hallie, i mean, the most unbelievable experience i ve ever had in my life. you can see the interconnections of our planet looking out the window of that nasa plane. quite literally, what happens in the arctic does not stay in the arctic. jacob soboroff, looking forward to part two on this program soon. we ll be right back with today s big picture. it s time now for your business of the week. john foley spent three years trying to get investors interested in his company peloton. while he kept hearing no, he focused on building the business that now has millions of customers. with a valuation of more than $1 billion, john says this is just the beginning. for more, watch your business weekend mornings at 7:30 on msnbc. announcer: sponsored by the powerful backing of american
if it was based on this, you are talking about the fruit of the poisonous tree. this could somehow exist within our system of justice, frankly is astonishing. but, sean, you look at these interconnections and this is really serious to the operation of justifiable. that s what s at stake here the constitution. sean: is it possible that hillary clinton and then hillary clinton s campaign and she is controlling the dnc according to donna brazile that her bought and paid for russian propaganda dossier with all the salacious details that could have been used to issue a fisa warrant against candidate trump, president-elect trump and his entire team? now, legally speaking, if that happened, wouldn t that render any information that they received out of that under false pretenses? illegal pretenses? yes, i mean, if in fact, when there is a lot of chatter about this, if in
you re talking about the fruit of the poisonous tree. it is all an idea that that somehow could exist within our system of justice is astonishing. sean, you look at these interconnections, and this is really serious to the operation of justice. that is what is at stake. sean: it is possible that hillary clinton and then hillary clinton s campaign seize control ofdi the dnc according to donna brazile,e, she is bought d paid for, russian propaganda dossier, with all of the salacious details, that could have been used to issue a warrant against candidate trump, and his entire team. legally speaking if that happens, does that warrant any affirmation that they received under false pretenses? yes, if, in fact, when there are a lot of chatter about this,
if it was based on this, you are talking about the fruit of the poisonous tree. this could somehow exist within our system of justice, frankly is astonishing. but, sean, you look at these interconnections and this is really serious to the operation of justifiable. that s what s at stake here the constitution. sean: is it possible that hillary clinton and then hillary clinton s campaign and she is controlling the dnc according to donna brazile that her bought and paid for russian propaganda dossier with all the salacious details that could have been used to issue a fisa warrant against candidate trump, president-elect trump and his entire team? now, legally speaking, if that happened, wouldn t that render any information that they received out of that under false pretenses? illegal pretenses? yes, i mean, if in fact, when there is a lot of chatter about this, if in