You have your 24 7 operations, your revenue funded service. The commission has only taken action on phase i, but we have included in all of our projections here if there were an approval on phase ii and phase iii just so you know phase ii and phase iii are included in our cost projection. Heres the combined story. The combined story again is water and sewer together, the rate changes once you look at both of them combined are going from what we had told you last year of right around 10 percent to between 10 and 12 percent a year. Again we will bring these rate changes back to you in the next 2 to 3 years once we have our retail cost of Service Study and in the interim period between now and then we will work on bringing these rate changes down as much as we possibly can. That was the rate side this is the bill side. Again, the average bill is projected to be slightly lower in 19 and 20 because of that reduced usage. We do show 20 years, weve gotten some questions over time about what h
Along with 5 projectfunded inaudible this half million increase is offset by the mou adjustments and leaves the total annual budget amount unchanged. The next slide shows the breakdown of the fte count and to authorized funded positions, salary savings, and the total positions funded in the operating budget. Associated with the new request for these Services Installation is an additional project funded ftes to reduce overtime, increasing the authorized positions from 749 to 754 in the water, regional and end city, and the total has increased from 2,402 to 24407. The proposed budget dollars remain unchanged and unaffected by these budget counts. A little explanation to support the increase of the new Service Installation program. The new Services Installation budget request will allow the water enterprise to reduce backlog in two places, Water Pipeline main connections and for new Service Requests. Currently the backlog for new Service Requests is 4 months and we are hoping to reduce th
Phase iii just so you know phase ii and phase iii are included in our cost projection. Heres the combined story. The combined story again is water and sewer together, the rate changes once you look at both of them combined are going from what we had told you last year of right around 10 percent to between 10 and 12 percent a year. Again we will bring these rate changes back to you in the next 2 to 3 years once we have our retail cost of Service Study and in the interim period between now and then we will work on bringing these rate changes down as much as we possibly can. That was the rate side this is the bill side. Again, the average bill is projected to be slightly lower in 19 and 20 because of that reduced usage. We do show 20 years, weve gotten some questions over time about what happens in year 11 and year 12 in our 10 year 12 so we show 20 years of future horizon on this chart. Can i i have a question on that. You know weve been talking a little bit about storm water fees, poten
To reopen any current rates at this time, but beginning in 19 you will see that those rates have gone up by 2 to 3 percent each year. Here is the average bill, the pronouncement again is much smaller again because water consumption assumption has gone down. Interesting again just the components of the sewer bill. You have your 24 7 operations, your revenue funded service. The commission has only taken action on phase i, but we have included in all of our projections here if there were an approval on phase ii and phase iii just so you know phase ii and phase iii are included in our cost projection. Heres the combined story. The combined story again is water and sewer together, the rate changes once you look at both of them combined are going from what we had told you last year of right around 10 percent to between 10 and 12 percent a year. Again we will bring these rate changes back to you in the next 2 to 3 years once we have our retail cost of Service Study and in the interim period b
The official category of 55, 45 so if we see one asset thats not right we pretty much put all that in the basket some maybe hire and some lower with 45 you cant go wrong is that yeah. I think youve described that well i was a young cubby was here but not involved in that negotiation you described my understanding of that perfectly so you end up with i think this is an important point to make with replaced to the mountain tunnel it is less true when you make it statement system wide you have joint financing and conceptual issues in general if we build a new power house or a new transition line nothing on the waterside that constraints our activity. Well, yes theyll be recognized as power assets. Well it is narrow and within the joint assets the mountain tunnel the elephant in the room. Tunnels are yes. I mean i have a similar question around the transition assets maybe well get to this this is actually taking it the next step if these are economics some well have conceptual and some Fin