fiction as jonathan said and others have said. it s really challenging when the story keeps changing. yeah. sondland has amended his testimony. he s been criticized again by fiona hill for his testimony that stands as not being accurate and then the issue of the phone call on september 9th. jonathan, the judiciary committee may get a report from the intel committee as early as next week. adam schiff said they re doing the report and they ll hand it over after the thanksgiving break. the judiciary committee has a hearing on wednesday in which it s going to hear from constitutional experts on impeachment itself. what the articles would look like. what the grounds for impeachment would be. what does impeachment mean, what does the constitutional language mean. to a lot of people that might sound dry but you argue it could be more important than what we have already heard in testimony. absolutely. this is the why of impeachment. you know, we heard from fact witnesses during the intelli
we do not know whether he would accept. garrett haake on capitol hill. thank you very much. i m joined by madelyn dean of pennsylvania who is a member of the house judiciary committee. congresswoman, thank you very much for joining us. have you been given assurances that the intel committee report will be released to the public before house judiciary holds its hearing? i don t know the timing of the report. that is exactly what we re waiting on, the report from the intelligence committee. you saw the process was laid out by house resolution 660, reaffirmed and repeated today by jerry nadler in a letter to the president. so i don t know the exact timing. we look forward to getting that whole report. remember, we had two important weeks of open testimony, public testimony by patriots, courageous people who came forward and told us of the irregular nature of the back channel dealings that the
they had to admit let s read it, uncovered, no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the truck campaign and russia. here now to discuss, former dependent counsel and chief political correspondent. how different might mueller s conclusions be from the senate intel committee report? i don t think they will be any different at all. you have to remember he has far more power, far more investigative power, power to compel witnesses than the senate does and he has a very highly trained professional staff with him. and it has been very clear to knowledgeable observers for quite some time that he did not have that case. the reason you could tell is by looking at the various plea agreements that have been signed by people who have pled guilty. they are all crimes either that
on the intel committee have come to a different conclusion than the republican members of the house came to in their intel committee report. because here there is broad agreement across chambers that there was some kind of russian attempt to influence voters. but over here, they have concluded that they think the russians were trying to help trump, which is something that the house members did not conclude. harris: peter doocy, thank you very much. let s bring in now republican senator james risch of idaho. he serves on the senate intelligence committee. great to see you today. start with the break of information how one side sees it and the other side sees it. democrats thinking that actually the russians were trying to help donald trump. well, there is certainly evidence to that effect. in the opening hearing we had, there was obvious evidence they were working both sides. probably the thing i came away with that was stunning to me is how inept they were
some of this unfold. an it does not appear that they are willin to say this matter is closed. steph. yikes. all right, kelly, i have to break this down with the panel. msnbc contrisht howard dean. former governor of vermont and former chair of the dnc. caitlin dawson. sean spicer clearly got defensive when he was asked about this new intel committee report that basically is discrediting president trump s wiretapping accusations. i want to play this exchange for you. it s interesting to me that, you know, just as a point of interest, that when one entity says one thing, that proves that claims one thing, you guys cover it ad nauseam. when devin nunes came out and said i think it s very possible. there were crickets. when he said there was no connection he saw to russia.