because it violatesit the integrity of the supreme court. and again, this comes from a person who supports a woman s right to have abortion not at the end of pregnancy, but is the beginningin of pregnancyd and i don t support the decision the supreme court, but i support decency, legality and fairness. all right. professor alan dershowitz, charlie, good to see you both. haveve a great weekend. thanks for being here. coming up next, breaking news in the elon musk twitter saga. carol markowitz and tedth budd join us . plus, the biden economy is gone from badad to worse. r rick perry reacts when we come figuring were you diagnosed with ovarian cancer or mesothelioma as your regular use of johnson and johnson baby powder or shower to shower for one day like nine , you may be entitled to compensation. johnson johnson failed to warn
0 about ite line that s for us tonight. sorry, biden joked our friend j jarocin for sean tonight. have the best night with the ones you love.te w i ll see you monday. at. welcome everyone to this special edition of hannity . i m right here i show tonight.em top democrats and their friendsc in the liberal media all butid begging president biden to do something, anything on a variety of key issues in response today, the white house signed a rather useless executive order on abortion rights that does little to nothingab, just another political stunt from a white house that is trulyen incompete. in every way. what else would you expect fromo a president who struggles with basic task s like, you know, walking and talking even with the assistance of a teleprompter? watch this. itit is noteworthy that the percentage of women who registered to vote and cast a ballot is consistently higher than the percentage of the menge who do so end of quote, repeated line women are notar without electo
issued? that s stating it a little too broadly. i want to say i m so glad you brought this up because everyone is paying attention to abortion and gun rights and re-lidges you liberties. but this is a case that at the center of the dispute is the famous miranda ruling. you have the right to remain silent. you have the right to have a lawyer. but it s not a question of whether you have to have the evidence withheld if you haven t been read the miranda rights. it s a question of whether someone who has not been read his miranda rights can bring an individual civil rights action against the officer who failed to do that. so, it s a kind of a side question on it. but during oral arguments in this, laura, in april, justin elena kagan said, do we really want to diminish this right in any way? do we want to undermine the legitimacy and the integrity of the supreme court to in any way diminish miranda rights, even though this isn t a direct assault on it? so, it s yet another one that
thomas has been. and certainly, we never had a supreme spouse involved directly in lobbying for a attempted coup, the government and certainly not in circumstances where supreme court justice, or hearing cases on that very issue, justice thomas has already heard a number of cases, these have no cases dealing with the election itself. and at no point as he recused himself in though his wife has been deeply mesh in all of this, again, this is the same justice who went on the road last week talking about the integrity of the supreme court, i think he needs to look at the man in the mirror, because that s where this is all starting. jonathan and jackie or the supreme court rejected donald trump s white house document from the january six committee, just this time of the time was the only one who was sentenced seems as like a clear, ethical issues, why aren t democrats making a bigger deal out of
supreme court and the stunning draft opinion that would over turn roe v wade. we are hearing from senators concerned over the integrity of the court or whether some of the nominees were truthful in their confirmation hearings. watch this. we ll discuss. the concern about what it means within the court and whether or not people are trusting the integrity of the court that should concern all of us in terms of confidence. i don t think they were being honest. why do you say that? i think most of them said they were going to go with past precedent and that isn t the case. my question to you, senator, what will over turning roe mean for the integrity of the supreme court? you know, thanks for having me. i think it means an awful lot because we have seen and i think an erosion of the integrity of