comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Insuring agreement - Page 3 : comparemela.com

An Alaska Court Goes Fishing for Insurance, Hooking Another Policyholder Win in a Phishing Scam Case | Miller Nash LLP

As an update to our March 8, 2022 blog post discussing coverage for phishing scams in the context of Ernst & Haas Mgt. Co. v. Hiscox, Inc., 23 F.4th 1195 (9th Cir. 2022), a new Alaska.

Part Five: Reviewing Key U S Insurance Decisions, Trends, & Developments | Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers

Landmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series: Trigger and Allocation

Delaware Superior Court Addresses Whether UIM Benefits are Available to Parties that Live in the Same Household but are Unrelated to Insured | Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires & Newby LLP

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: On November 20, 2020, the Superior Court of Delaware confirmed that coverage denials that rely on plain policy language outlined in an automobile insurance policy’s Insuring Agreement, as opposed to a policy exclusion, are more likely to be upheld in underinsured/uninsured motorist claims. In  Michael Ruiz, Tammy Irizarry, Individually and as Next Friend of G.I. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, C.A. NO.: S19C-07-024, (Del. Super. November 19, 2020)., the Court enforced the plain language of the applicable automobile insurance policy when determining that underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage was not available to members of a household shared with an unrelated insured.  

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.