still have them, what kind of a message is that the going to send to the united states or will they have keep them in the garage so to speak for this particular parade. and then of course the mass game, something that hasn t happened in more than five ye s years. i ve been told that it is extraordinary to see tens of thousands of north koreans in a stadium holding up cards and flipping the cards to create these different images. in the last year, they were a mushroom cloud, a missile. this year the messages will tell us a lot about north korea s focus and their messaging moving forward as they have said that they are now trying to focus more on their economy and they finished their nuclear program. we look forward to your reporting on the event. thank you so much, will ripley for us yet again live from north korea. and also good to catch will on instragram. he has great information that he posts regularly on his trips to north korea. switching now to a big situation that is affec
lived this lavish lifestyle when the average american is working very hard to make their own mortgage. so i think that it will come down to the fact that the jury may not like manafort. what about the president? he comments on this trial and yes judge ellis has said that they may not read newspapers, don t go on the internet, but if you go to the airport this weekend, you see any manner of television screens with headlines blaring and red flashing lights as to breaking news an backers. you can walk anywhere in new york city and see a ticker underneath a giant july are bmbd read the news. should sequestration have happened in this case? donald trump is definitely trying to influence the jury by making these comments. it is inappropriate and wrong. he shouldn t have said that. because like you said, anytime a juror picks up their facebook post or instragram, someone could say something and repost something, showing what donald trump said. and it is awful because it could
she s fought so hard. i mean, it was very hard work as we know from her anonymous blog at the time and then subsequently her work and on instragram. she is changing her life, but she is changing it also to be a member of the world s most proceed profile royal family. and as such, she will be able to help so many people. diana was able to do this because she was a member of the royal family, but of course was deeply unhappy. harry will see to it that meghan is happy and also of course you ve got an extremely independent person, you have someone who is extremely arctic could articulate and deeply committed. and as shakespeare said, i think deed the marriage of two mind. gentlemen, this is all very exciti exciting.
cambridge analytica in great detail and in triplicate. they are asking him broad questions on terms of service and privacy. so it is allowing mark to make broad answers raesh highther thy specific questions. it seems like the senators are explaining like they know how to use the internet. one senator said his son likes instragram, not sure what it has to do with anything, but it is nice. so i would ask why didn t they tell the ftc about certain things, how many other organizations have misused the data, how it was used. i d be highly specific about these things. and mark may or may not have the answers, but at least put the questions out there . former very senior official intelligence agency says that if he were looking to infiltrate the trump campaign, you would have looked at their finance reports, seen cambridge analytica as a vendor and that would have been the soft target
messages, text messages, instragram messages, facebook posting or any other type of creation. question, did stormy daniels hand over whatever evidence she s got of this liaison? i m not going to answer that question but here s what i m going to say. mr. trump and mr. cohen and others better be very, very careful relating to statements publish as to whether this actually happened or not. that is what i m going to say. but she had a contractual obligation to hand over whatever she was in possession of before she took the 130 k. and i didn t say that she didn t. and i didn t say that she did. what i ve said is i won t answer the question. okay. one other question if i might. there is another paragraph i don t think i blew it up, but 5.11, disgorgement. this says that if she violates it, she owes $1 million for every episode that she goes out and speaks in violation of the