Your party passed a bill in the house to balance the budget. How did we get to this point . That is not just the spending. That is the deficit. Onhave gotten there based benign neglect. On the democratic side, more versus more. On the republican side, i see no evil, i speak no evil, but it is a great detriment to the american taxpayer, American Dream, but we got here. Hard, soith it will be people dont want to and have left it alone. Troublesomeularly with the weight is president has made promises to eliminate the debt. Be ahas proven to completely empty promise. He raised the debt by 9 billion. He signed off on deals raising additional billions in debt. Is that there has been zero leadership on the president ial level, benign neglect from the congressional level. Debt in one year. Where is the Republican Party that has claimed to be deficit hawks . Malignuld describe it as neglect, not benign neglect. This is a National Security issue. We cant rely on other countries our debt. It is a
Of being terrorists now they assessed media reports u. S. Government statements vehicle purchase records official i. D. s medical records everyone the organization spoke to was adamant that none of the men were members of out. You know youre a pretty big piece of evidence its a pretty important one that if theyre willing but i think it also says something that when for comes in their response they said you know well look at any relevant information well look at any of this that relates to admin their mind theyre not going to consider about rez long as they dont consider relevant or consider a you know a piece of information that they need to look at they dont have to because they decide they decide what are exactly in a country that is not theirs that youre in a country that is not yours and yours telling them what is and what you know what people are not. And you know its one of those things to worry at this point its not shocking to hear that i know what it is so you know seeing stor
So lets think about some real world use cases. So, i am in the Counter Terrorism business and i know that there are five individuals in central london, where were sitting right now, that want to do harm on a massive scale to the public. Would you have public support to use facial recognition to try to intercept that group of individuals before they could do harm . I would suggest almost categorically that you would. An opposite example now. An individual is being kicked out of the pub for drinking too much on a saturday night. The pub has taken a photo of that individual. Should that individual be prevented from getting into that establishment and other establishments because of that incident . I think you would have very little public consent for that example. Do you support it . And we have more news of a nursery nurse who has been released from jail after serving ten years. That news is breaking now. Hello. Welcome to the programme. Were live until am this morning. What do you think
Well. Thats so much it appears that Amnesty International felt there was more to this story than what africa was letting on so theyd been a little digging and discovered that all evidence appears to reveal that the 3 men were nothing more than civilian farmers not terrorists. But the story didnt end there at the time of the airstrike afrikan issued a press release stating we are aware of reports alleging civilian casualties were resulting from this airstrike as with any allegation of civilian casualties we received u. S. Africa command a command will review any information it has about the incident including any relevant information provided by 3rd parties. However good friends of Amnesty International disagree with this statement observing that in may a journalist writing for Foreign Policy provided africa with evidence that uber how mohammad heerey one of the men in the car was a civilian and passed Contact Information for his relatives but to date africa has not reached out to any o
The day like you that i got. With that we. Would. Be. Pretty. Well going on the watching our entire world with her and happen a lot less so Amnesty International just so were clear on everything in their investigation Amnesty International interviewed 11 people about that march 18th strike that included family members those who had been to the scene and the staff at the Telecom Company where the men also work those who are accused by africa of being terrorists now they assessed media reports the Us Government statements vehicle purchase records official ideas medical records everyone the organization spoke to was adamant that none of them were members of our. You know you have a pretty big piece of evidence its a pretty important one that if theyre willing but i think it also says something when for comes in their response they said you know well look at any relevant information well look at any of this that relates to admin their mind theyre not going to consider that rez long as they