And also with that we have [laughter] we have a commentary on the constitution of the United States, two volumes. This is gorgeous. And also what we call the familiar exposition of the constitution of the United States by the joseph story, and with all modesty i must say it has a foreword by me. [laughter] [applause] now if youll join us all, and we have in the foyer we will have a reception where you can personally meet the judge, but before we leave i just want to thank you again personally for being with us for all youve done for the law, and particularly for being with us tonight. Thank you very much. Thank you. [applause] [inaudible conversations] we take you live now to the National Press club for remarks from Veterans Affairs secretary robert mcdonald. You will be speaking today but efforts to improve medical care and other services for veterans. Secretary mcdonald has been on the job for just over 100 days. It took over the department after former secretary Eric Shinseki retire
Of minor crimes like speeding as we point out in our brief, dui, littering, all kinds of minor crimes the person can make a fairly convincing argument sometimes that evidence on the phone would be relevant to that crime of arrest. I think that brings me where i want to end, understanding what the rule the government profounds would do in terms of just ordinary police work. Remember this case starts with a traffic stop for expired license plate. It is Everyday Police work that traffic stops are the beginning of criminal investigations and a leverage point into searches. If you adopt the rule at that says, even a gant rule that says, if you can making a argument that evidence on the phone would be relevant to the crime of arrest, take the suspended license, you may have an email from the dm vteling you better come in to renew. If that opens up every americans entire life to the police department, not just at the scene, but later at station house and downloaded into their computer forever
Yes. And for some reason, though, the new switch was not given a part number and instead shared a number with the original defective switch. Is that correct . Yes. Now this new switch also did not meet gms minimum torque specificications either. This one delfi said was in the range of 10 to 15 and it really should have been 15 at a minimum. Is that correct . I have not seen the test results. You dont know that. Ok. Now, despite these facts gm continued to manufacture cars with these same ignition switches with the model years 2008 to 2011. Is that correct . Yes. And between 2004 and 2014, no Public Notices were issued as a result of gms knowledge of these facts and no recalls were issued for the over 2. 5 million vehicles manufactured with these defective ignition switches. Is that correct . Yes. And finally, three recalls were made this year, 2014. Two in february and one just last friday. Is that right . Related to this ignition switch . Now, i have just a couple more questions. The
Invest in new American Energy to make our economy stronger. If we make high quality preschool available to every child, not only will we give our kids a safe place to learn and grow while their parents go to work, we will give them the start they need to succeed in school and earn higher wages. And for more stable families of their own. Today, i am setting a new goal. By the end of this decade, lets enroll 6 million children and high quality preschool. That is an achievable goal that we know will make our workforce stronger. [applause] if we redesign our high schools, we will graduate more kids with realworld skills that lead to a good job in the new economy. If we invest more in job training and apprenticeships, we will have more workers coming back to the country. If we make it easier for students to pay out their college loans, we will help a whole lot of young people [cheering and applause] breathe easier and take the jobs they really want. Lets do this, lets keep reforming our Edu
Thing about the 12 . Now ive got the word similar source. Which then can refer me back to the categorization of two thingse sass i say, maybe. Then i have aside from that hey, heres what you do. When youre regulating, you look at the top 12 generators, and thats the minimum standard. So they might want to say hey, thats not right. I mean its right, it says it. But if you go to the bottom 50 generators, youre going to see it is not going to cost 120 per family. It is going to cost 1,000 a family. And we have the epa saying we wont even look at that point i begin to say, oh my goodness, why . Why wont you even look at it . You can say it isnt true, but why wont you even look at it . Now the answer seems to be in that word similar source and classes and is up classes. Because were there such an argument. Maybe the epa could say, dont worry if there is such an argument which there isnt we have the power here you should the statute to take itkbna into account. Now, you know where that argum