foinr the pledge what america stands for is under threat and it s really serious we see it is this preposterous prosecution of w york, even in ne ex-president you may hate or as it says on the front of thee supreme court equal justicee under law, yes even for presidential candidates you may be desperate to stop, of course no one is above the law but no o one is below it either. all week you ve been hearing thi details of why this case is trumped up and ludicrous weti don t need tmeo spend time on tt tonight only the most demented and cultish hyper- partisan would take any of the seriouslyh unfortunately most of the media seem to be demented and trumpd hating partisans these days. there you go thesans importantoa point, the privacy of the ruleru of law and american life is onem of the thingers that america has most putin buyer for its one ofe the things i most admire america for from afar now democrats are going to throw that away and make us look like a dictatorship w
massively consequential policy announcement in response to a questionnaire from a tv show that is amateur hour on an invasion of a sovereign country and territorial dispute givingto moral equivalence to the criminal and the victim insteadt of cleaning it up making it worse he tells her friend piers morgan he wahes mischaracterized how could you be mischaracterized when it was your own words that you freely set and responding to a questionnaire pierce and tucker have different views on ukraine but rhonda caucus was trying toe agree with them both and his weakness and incompetence and flip-floppinpping and panderingl squished into one deeply serious episode that is deeply worrying when the threats to what americs stands for are also serious threats to the idea of liberty and justice for all threats to the freedom of speech is to be every americans birthright andte threats to the global leadership that our prosperity our way of life and or opportunities are
with 12% his families or allies own and you very quickly add up to the entire company owned by deripaska or people close to putin. the whole idea is we need to get control of this company away from the crekremlin and insteadt stays effectively in kremlin control and in control of the kremlin connected oligarch plus he benefits to the tunes of hundreds of millions of the dollars. i know it s a complex case but i feel like you ve nailed it. thanks for helping us understand it. thanks for having me on to understand it. i will say that the thing that always gives these guys away, deep into ken vogel, mr. dara c deripaska s associate expressed dissatisfaction and says this is terrible, hurting us so much. your private expresses of satisfaction and gloating will