he probably has to shoulder some of the blame for some of the things that got wrong. some might think it s a bit rich, given the fact that he was thought to have broken the spirit of lockdown rules at a really critical point in the first lockdown, and that sent out a particular message to the public. so i d do think some of this is just people lining themselves up, you know, putting blame on other people, taking some of the credit for themselves. i think coming back to themselves. i think coming back to the idea of the inquiry, there are some really important things to balance here, and there s so much that an balance here, and there s so much thatan inquiry balance here, and there s so much that an inquiry could achieve. and i think you absolutely have to have a post hoc, judge led inquiry with the power to summon people, compelling them to give evidence, the guardian says there s a lot public support for it, only 18% are opposed to it. but there is a time and place for that