healthcare, co2 emission, battery lifetime and so on and so forth, these particular challenges can now be addressed with quantum technology, so for an innovation perspective live for europe, it is an incredible step forward. it is a historic moment because now we open the door to overcome these issues and create economic wealth and and create economic wealth and a far better planet as it was before. , before. but in the future, they will become before. but in the future, they will become more before. but in the future, they will become more everyday, i will become more everyday, won t they? in terms of people using quantum computing as opposed to traditional computing? is that the idea and therefore everything will be that much faster and the response will be better, is that where we are going? well, we first of that where we are going? well, we first of all that where we are going? well, we first of all going that where we are going? well, we first of all going into - that w
hemispherically. north america from a creativity perspective, from an innovation perspective, this is the most competitive region in the world. right. and i think that donald trump is bumping up against reality here and good because this would have been terrible for the country and the american workers. the reason i want to talk to you about this is i remember actually barack obama and hillary clinton both promised to renegotiate nafta or said they were going to renegotiate nafta in 2008. you ve got the situation where if you poll americans on these trade deals, they re quite skeptical of them. there s also good macro economic data to show they have had an affect in rising inequality, which is not to say they haven t been a boon overall. but i wonder how much this sort of sense that we re seeing across the entire sort of west, right, of people feel like they re not in control and the globalists are how much does this add fuel to the fire when donald trump runs on i m going to g
their versions of the singh wednesday of eve sequence of events would be a little different. i suspect you re right. this is a $500 billion a area trading relationship with mexico. it s upwards of nearly $1 trillion with canada. for 35 states, the number one trading partner is canada. for the ones that it s not, in the number two, and the rest, the trading relationship is with mexico. this would have plunged the american economy into a recession. it would have tanked the stock market. there are millions and millions of american jobs dependent on the free flow of trade and goods across the borders in north america. and i think increasingly, chris, we talk about competitiveness over the next decade, the decade after that, and we look hemispherically. north america from a creativity perspective, from an innovation perspective, this is the most competitive region in the world. right. and i think that donald trump is bumping up against reality
if you are going to save money and reduce your footprint, a little more time and live is going to be better. we see a bunch happening in san francisco, new york city. there are developments around the world starting. i think it is a way to be cost effective and responsible with housing available in the cities. the world is urbanizing. 1.5 million people a week are moving to cities. it is great from a green perspective and an innovation perspective. they show it really bumps up innovation. small is sexy. we want space efficiency, things that are designed for how they are used the vast majority of the time, no the that rare event. why have a six-burner stove when you rarely use three? when. when i was talking to him about life edited, i thought it was a really interesting
gusto? there s a structural advantage on the left right now. it hasn t always been the case. 2004 was a sort of major period of innovation for bush s re-election campaign. one of the from a sort of innovation perspective in politics the powers of incumbency can not be in any way understated. one of the problems of campaigns they don t invest in research because for six months they go away. continuity in chicago. basically still trying to solve problems they posed five years ago. the immediate wake of the election in november 2008, they had postmortems, laid out what we did well, didn t do well, what we want to do and lay out a huge research agenda and for four years since then had control of the national dollar, over a billion dollar, tons of small races to try things out and so they re able to behave a lot more like a corporation and have basically a research and development function than your normal campaign which is like a pop-up shop that cares about like and in their m