look at the house investigation as an entirely phony and useless probe. jay, last question to you. steve bannon invited to testify before the house panel in the new year. no word if they accepted that in ini invitation. what does that tell you about the direction they are headed in? well, it means they are interested in this dossier. it is worthwhile noting when they interviewed alexander they did it from a law firm in downtown washington, d.c. forcing members who are interested in seeing that interview to leave the hill and go down to off campus. that s very unusual because if there are votes called you need to be on campus. it shows they are interested in this dossier and it s very controversial and they are going down that sort of rabbit hole.
enforcing voter id laws, it s not going to go well, catherine. you know, it s um, the fact is we have a strong process, we should have well-trained observers inside of the polls. that s part of the process. but those observers should be americans. and the thought that the naacp and the aclu feels the need to go to kazahkstan? yeah, i just beg to differ. megyn: now, they say this group that they they ve been invited by several states to monitor elections in the past. it s not the ones you mentioned, it s like new mexico and some other states. right. megyn: but they say, look, we had an ini invitation from themn the past, and we re going to take them up on this in the future. are they allowed to go into any state that hasn t specifically paveed the way for them to do that? well, certain states do allow for the unite nations monitors to go in, in fact, the body that the naacp has approached, the osce, is something the united states has been a part of for