which imply a lot of people, they get a lot of activity moving, but it s more than just big get a lot of activity moving, but it s more thanjust big in researcher projects, it s the areas where you live, what facilities are available, what your housing is like, living in poor housing is a really good indicator of poor health outcomes and life expectancy. this is one of the more quietly disturbing pieces of news that s in the papers that we are seeing today because, you know, we need to take action on this. it s just not good enough, we need to do better at this, and i think the government needs to think carefully about its tragedy for leveling up and its outcomes as well as the big glorious grandiose projects strategy. i agree withjames at grandiose projects strategy. i agree with james at the government seems agree with james at the government seems to agree with james at the government seems to have this big infrastructure top down, if we throw
enough infrastructure top down, if we throw enough money at left behind towns, then we enough money at left behind towns, then we can level up the country it s not then we can level up the country it s not as then we can level up the country it s not as simple as that because the government haven t neglected these the government haven t neglected these left behind towns and communities, they ve tried to address communities, they ve tried to address the problem, but there has been a address the problem, but there has been a lack address the problem, but there has been a lack of creative thinking. and often been a lack of creative thinking. and often i feel like the discussion is framed and often i feel like the discussion is framed in how the government can improve is framed in how the government can improve the is framed in how the government can improve the living standards of the poorest improve the living standards of the poorest in improve the living st