Reform, her chancellor was ruffling feathers, not least in his own party, when he suggested that actually after march 2019, divergence between britain and the eu would be pretty modest. We will come onto brexit in a while. Lets begin with the bigger picture, everything we heard at davos. Henry, lets start with you. We will start with the president , the first visit for nearly 20 years. Was it more conciliatory than the audience anticipated . I think people were anticipating a nativist speech, the kind of rhetoric we are used to from trump. It was more temperate. Said america first, but not america alone. The first president to visit for many years. He had never been invited before as a businessman until now, as president. You always have to be careful about rhetoric and policy with trump. He is hard to nail down. He says one thing one day, and his administration does another the next day. He said at davos, we are not protectionist in the scary way the press are portraying, and yet at t
The conversation has already begun. Im jane hill. This week we ask was anything achieved at the World Economic forum in davos . What do the british chancellors comments there tell us about brexit . And the situation on the syria turkey border what is the us going to do about its muddle in the middle east . My guests this week henry chu, Europe Bureau chief of variety. Eunice goes, the portuguese writer and journalist. The french algerian journalist, nabila ramdani. And the british political commentator and author, steve richards. Welcome to you all. We start in the swiss resort of davos, where donald trump was the first us president to attend the World Economic forum for 18 years. His presence attracted an enormous amount of attention, just as he likes it. Was there just a shade less protectionism in his speech than had been anticipated . Youd have thought the gathering was all about trump. Of course, the worlds political and Business Elite was there too. Emmanuel macron of france call
10,000 square feet, per planning code 121. 1. And merger of a lot greater than 5,000 square feet in the rto district 121. 7. These are the entitlements before you. The existing structure at 1965 market is historic. In 1924, it was built as a mortuary and funery chapel. A third floor was added in 1933. The building is eligible for the National Register with commercial development and north neighborhood for its distinctive Spanish Colonial Mission Revival architecture and the savings and loan established. The project would retain the 1965 historic facade and retain the uses for interpretive display to be permanently installed in the retail space. The project sponsor has elected to utilize the state and city bonus as implemented by planning code 206. 6. In accordance with the departments policies, theres been a 96unit project. Because the sponsor is providing 14 Units Available to lowincome households, the project is eligible for one concession they seek the concession to allow developmen
Taylor rule, how would would that impede your response to such a crisis . The taylor rule would tell us that it should depend on only two variables the current level of real gdp or the out put gap and the current level of inflation. It obviously wouldnt take into account in any way our judgments about growth in the Global Economy how we expected the european economy would be affected or Global Financial markets by these such developments. So in that sense it really restricts any simple rule restricts the setting of Monetary Policy to a very short list of variables and typically there are current values. Thats one of the reasons. We spent spend a great deal of time and the forecast that we include in our Monetary Policy report that the participants right down, we present to the public every three months. Incorporate all of the kinds of information, what what we think is going to happen in the Global Economy, and those are economic developments. Those factor into our Economic Forecast an
Continued the calls for the destruction of israel. These are the people we just allowed, are all lowg in the process to more weapons and to become nuclear weaponscapable. Just last week iran called, as it has for decades for the destruction of israel. And the death to america. In fact, as irans Supreme Leader stood by calling for the need to fight the u. S. , even if there is an agreement. I dont know that weve ever entered into an agreement with another country before that while we enter into the agreement they say and by the way, no matter whether there is agreement or not we want to continue to see the u. S. As an enemy that we need to fight. This deal undermines the security of our friends and allies it legitimatizes irans unapologetic sponsorship of terrorism throughout the middle east. Interesting what could be included, by the way mr. President , what couldnt be included. Iran has repeatedly refused to abide by International Agreements that require inspection of Nuclear Faciliti