Explicitly say you shall not regulate or oversee the internet under title 2. Do you agree with that . As ive testified consistently, i think the cost and damage to americans ambitions of bradband in title 2 far outweigh the benefits. I think if the narrow task before us is to create solid bullet proof Net Neutrality, which we accept, we believe that can be done without resorting to that hammer. Mr. Chairman, i want to thank the former chairman for those comments. I do believe that its wise to put this out as a draft. I think there are some very valid questions and my friends on the minority are asking some of those questions about how to perfect the language. I have some concerns myself about certain parts of the draft. But the base principle, the fact we should not regulate the internet under title 2, i think is beyond question. If we start from that premise i think the discussion draft is an excellent document and we can iron out the details through these hearings. If you take it to
Journalism without a safety net syria coverage two powerful women in print journalism take a fall theres a battle in washington over the way the worldwide web should work. The stakes are high. If the internet is a superhighway should there be a fast lane for those that can pay the price or a slow lane for those that cant. Should everyone be treated equally, regardless of whether they are big corporate backing or small. The f. C. C. Is trying to figure that out as they try to propose new rules for the broadband, to make it work without stifling freedom of expression. Critics argue that Service Providers will create a 2tier internet, charging a premium for access to the fast lane spelling the end to Net Neutrality. The challenge is how to preserve Net Neutrality without regulating the life out of the internet. Got all that . Our starting point is washington d. C. What this is about is a battle of who controls the future of communications. Will it be the people that use the internet or th
Journalism without a safety net syria coverage two powerful women in print journalism take a fall theres a battle in washington over the way the worldwide web should work. The stakes are high. If the internet is a superhighway should there be a fast lane for those that can pay the price or a slow lane for those that cant. Should everyone be treated equally, regardless of whether they are big corporate backing or small. The f. C. C. Is trying to figure that out as they try to propose new rules for the broadband, to make it work without stifling freedom of expression. Critics argue that Service Providers will create a 2tier internet, charging a premium for access to the fast lane neutrality. The challenge is how to preserve Net Neutrality without regulating the life out of the internet. Got all that . Our starting point is washington d. C. What this is about is a battle of who controls the future of communications. Will it be the people that use the internet or the powerful corporations
Laredo Deputy City Manager Cabello announces August retirement lmtonline.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from lmtonline.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.