omissions. and it is the omissions that i was trying to get at when i was questioning representative turner in our earlier block, because that, too, is what, i guess creates the full picture of what the truth is, what the facts are. he kept on saying that opposition research that is politically motivated should never be used in order to get any kind of fisa warrant. does that make sense to you? well, i understand his point with respect to political research, but the issue is when information is presented to the fisa court, the fbi and the department of justice in making that application will give the court an assessment of the reliability of those sources. and an application in establishing probable cause would not be based on one specific fact that is presented. so if they have presented the information po the court they would have to say, this is how we assess the reliability of this source, and what the nunes memo argues and the thenarrativ is, is that the fbi and the doj