guilty or tom barrack or anyone. tom barrack hasn t spoken to investigates are since he spoke to mueller s team last year. does that tell you anything about the investigation? it could mean they had every information piece that they needed from him and they exhausted that particular resource. it could mean they wanted to wait for corroboration from other people. they had a certain amount of leads from him and pursued them. it doesn t necessarily give you any indication of whether or not this person would ultimately be in their cross hairs but does tell you that at a very early stage they were looking at this very issue. they were identifying leads well before the wall street journal reports it, well before people were aware of it and before you knew about the known cooperators like rick gates. this would have predated his actual decision to plead in lew of going to trial along with his former chairman paul manafort. so do you see that h this idea that once again, all of the notions
middle of this situation, things really do seem to be falling into place. i m not saying anyone is guilty, tom barrett or anyone. just in the reporting. lori, tom barrett hasn t spoken to investigators since he spoke to mueller s team last year. does that tell you anything about this investigation? well, it could mean that they had every information piece that they needed from him, and they ve exhausted that particular resource. it could mean that they wanted to wait for corroboration from other people. they had a certain amount of leads from him. they pursued them. able to corroborate. it doesn t necessarily give you any indication of whether or not this person would ultimately be in their crosshairs, but it does tell you that at a very early stage they were looking at this very issue. they were identifying leads well before the wall street journal reports it, well before people were aware of it and well before you even knew about the known cooperators like rick gates. this pred
showed the launch of, that is, you know, attacking the concept of mutual assured destruction and what he wants to do is to make sure that we feel uneasy about our ability to defend against the weapons that russia has. and so we launched off a submarine an intercontinental ballistic missile this week in the pacific ocean. so russia. judge: you don t hear about that as much. exactly. judge: sounds like a tit-for-tat again. very much. almost like a war by proxy that we had in the cold war as you mentioned at the beginning of the segment. this is through the elements, power diplomatic information. military, economic. you see spies being fired. you see information wars. that s an information piece. judge: they call it a spy spat as i was reading. doory, all this talk about the left and how the president has colluded after, what, 14, 15 months,
showed the launch of, that s, you know, attacking the concept of mutual assured destruction. what he wants to do is to make sure that we feel uneasy about our ability to defend against the weapons that russia has, and so we launched off a submarine an intercontinental ballistic missile this week in the pacific ocean. russia launched its jeanine: you don t hear that, though. sounds like a tit-for-tat. this is through the elements of powered diplomatic military economic. you see spies being fired. you see information wars.ir that s an information piece. jeanine: they call it a spy spat as i was reading. all the talk about the left and how the president has colluded
president putin supposedly showed the launch of, that is, you know, attacking the concept of mutual assured destruction and what he wants to do is to make sure that we feel uneasy about our ability to defend against the weapons that russia has. and so we launched off a submarine an intercontinental ballistic missile this week in the pacific ocean. so russia. judge: you don t hear about that as much. exactly. judge: sounds like a tit-for-tat again. very much. almost like a war by proxy that we had in the cold war as you mentioned at the beginning of the segment. this is through the elements, power diplomatic information. military, economic. you see spies being fired. you see information wars. that s an information piece. judge: they call it a spy spat as i was reading. doory, all this talk about the left and how the president has colluded