clinton i know what you mean by serving and it was worth deciding between speaking or concealing i looked over the twenty and that my judgement was we had to speak because hiding the fact that what we had said in the summer under oath was no longer true was an unacceptable outcome so suspicious were the reports to g c h q that the organization flew to washington in the summer of twenty sixteen to brief the cia director john brennan james clapper the director of national intelligence later confirmed this. information intelligence he said it s sensitive so there was a lot of sensitive material coming into that so that s not classified that s no i can say that i disagree with your preamble i don t believe it to be accurate but i can t sort for you know because the rules governing class what information what s true and not true the whole lot of reporting about this is not accurate but i can t go into it more than that but you didn t worry i thought that if the investigation
clinton i want to minimize your money and it was worth deciding between speaking or concealing on october the twenty eighth and that my judgment was we had to speak because hiding the fact that what we had said in the summer under oath was no longer true was an unacceptable outcome so suspicious were the reports did you see which clearly that the organization flew to washington in the summer of twenty six going to brief the cia director john brennan james clapper the director of national intelligence later confirmed this flow i think information intelligence he said it s sensitive so there was a lot of sensitive material coming into that so that s not classified that s not i can say that i disagree with your preamble i don t believe it to be accurate but i can t sort for you know because of the rules governing class sort of relation what s true or not true the whole lot of reporting about this is not accurate but i can t go into it more than that but you didn t worry at all that if the
we would be able to absolutely understand what he s saying. reporter: yeah. the target is clearly president trump and also people in the united states. there is a huge international effort right now to try to convince president trump to either stay or leave this nuclear agreement. prime minister netanyahu s been a vocal opponent, a really staunch opponent, of this nuclear agreement, even before it was signed while it was being negotiated. today basically laid out that case saying iran can t be trusted. that they are liars. they ve been lying about their nuclear program not only in the 19d 90s and early 2000 s as well. this is essentially prime minister netanyahu s argument. is that iran just simply can t be trusted. and he used information intelligence information that while new, in terms of what we re seeing on the screen today was publicly known. iran has denied in the past its nuclear program. that s not news to anyone. we ve heard that for decades
have been. and that section of the transcript reads the fbi believed chris s information might be credible because they had other intelligence that indicated the same thing. and one of those pieces of information intelligence was a human source from inside the trump organization. so this is likely to be a question that will come up shortly at the white house briefing, dana. dana: why did the senator say that she released this? was it in her authority to do so? technically it may not have been in her authority, but she had the power to do it which she did this afternoon. it shows this breakdown in trust between senator dianne feinstein and the chairman of the committee, chuck grassley, you will remember at the end of last week, senator grassley and senator graham set a criminal referral of christopher steele to the government, they want him investigated over allegations that he lied to federal
russian interference in the election. i encountered and am aware of information intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between russian officials and u.s. persons involved in the trump campaign. i was concerned about because of known russian efforts to such individuals and it raised questions, in my mind, again, whether or not the russians were able to gain the cooperation of other individuals. i don t know whether or not such collusion and that s your term, such collusion existed. but i know there was a sufficient basis of information and intelligence that required further investigation by the bureau to determine whether or not u.s. persons were actively conspiring, colluding with russian officials. joining us now, former acting