if i could take that first shot at that one. if you look at d.i.a. thanks for all the support the committee provides to the defense intelligence agentz. you look at our coordination and foreign militaries and operational environment central to looking at doctrine and what they are developing. when you think about artificial intelligence our near peer competitors are pursuing this. commercial technology that is available. when you look at the volume and big data and what is available, the ability to digest and pull all that information in, artificial intelligence will be integral to that. an example of one of the projects we re working on at the open source level project maven. full motion video. social media, full motion video you never will be able to afford the workforce to go through all the material, whether it s video, whether it s what admiral rogers works in the way of intelligence or what s available in social media. artificial intelligence and
i m not going to necessarily show all of our cards. i ve never questioned his mental fitness. i have no reason to question his mental fitness. my relationship with him and it is a developing one and i remind people. i think it s well known he and i did not know one another before he asked me to serve as secretary of state. so which don t have a lot of history in the past. a part of this is us coming together to learn. you are also two different kind of people. we have different management styles. how i make decisions. how i process information, i have to learn how he takes information in, processes it and makes a decision. and that s my responsibility. i m here to serve his presidency. so i ve had to spend a lot of time understanding how to best communicate with him so i can serve his needs with information. i do think one of my roles is to always give him all sides of the issues, even when i know it s not the side that he really wants to consider, i think it s a part of making goo
and describe your relationship with him. because some people would think it s, you know, through his tweets and stuff it s not a very good relationship. i ve never questioned his mental fitness. i have no reason to question his mental fitness. my relationship with him and it is a developing one, and i remind people and i think it s well known that he and i did not know one another before he asked me to serve as secretary of state. so we don t have a lot of history. part of this is us knowing coming to learn and understand you re also two different kinds of people. with well, we have different management styles. how i make decision, how i process information, i have to learn how he takes information in, processes it and makes decisions. that s my responsibility. i m here to serve his presidency. so i ve had to spend a lot of time understanding how to best communicate with him so i can serve his needs with information. i do think one of my roles is to always give him all sides
not know one another before he asked me to serve as secretary of state. so we don t have a lot of history in the past, so part of this is us coming to learn and understand one another. also two different kinds of people. well, we have different management styles. how i make decisions, how i process information, i have to learn how. he takes information in, processes it, and makes decisions. that s my responsibility. i m here to serve his presidency. so i ve had to spend a lot of time understanding how to best communicate with him so i can serve his needs with information. i do think one f my roles is to always give him all side of the issues, even when i know it s the side that he really wants to consider, i think it s part of making good decisions is i know he at least has had visibility to all aspects of the decision he s about to make. and that s my role of secretary of state is to provide him the whole 360 visibility of what decisions mean for foreign
convince a jury that a crime happened here. a lot of the times in rape cases the problem is if you don t have physical evidence if there s a relationship, all of these little tiny facts come into play. so the credibility, credibility credit bltdbility is the issue. when you don t have physical evidence you can use a pattern and practice and if you get that information in then the jury says two, three, four five times you re corroborating somebody else s testimony. they have to make up for the fact there s no physical evidence, no eyewitnesses, but another important part of evidence in these types of cases is outcry and that is when did the girl say something? and that s very powerful in this case because she did outcry very close to the time of the incident. almost right away. for folks who haven t been following the story closely, lot of people looking at social media earlier, why now? why the charges now? my understanding is it s