that releasing their full reasons for searching mar-a-lago would cause, and i quote, significant and irreparable damage. the justice department now urging a judge not to unseal the affidavit that justified the fbi search over the mar-a-lago home. a document, according to the d.o.j., that serves as a road map to the ongoing investigation including who federal investigators are talking to. saying that it includes, and i want to quote this one, highly sensitive information about witnesses, including witnesses interviewed by the government. that is, witnesses, not witness, witnesses, plural. according to the former chief of the justice department s counter intelligence section who oversaw the investigation of hillary clinton s handling of classified documents, that plural, witnesses, means multiple people told tell doj there was still classified information at mar-a-lago. multiple people. i m going to speak to david in a moment. the justice department also is arguing that redacti
we shouldn t cut taxes. it s been that we could only cut taxes once we have controlled inflation and debt. first cut inflation, then cut taxes. and that s why i made a promise to have inflation and the official statistics show that promise has now been met. so now that inflation has halved, and our growth is stronger, meaning revenues are higher, we can begin the next phase and turn our attention to cutting tax. we will do this in a serious, responsible way, based on fiscal rules to deliver sound money and alongside the independent forecast of the office for budget responsibility. that was the prime minister, for budget responsibility. that was the prime minister, rishi for budget responsibility. that was the prime minister, rishi sunak. i for budget responsibility. that was| the prime minister, rishi sunak. we are also expecting to hear from chancellorjeremy hunt, addressing the cbi, the confederation of british industry is, due to address them shortly, we will bring you
we read the do $judge filing today, they talk about witnesses, plural. what does that mean to you? it signifies that there was more than one person who made the statements to the justice department, directly or through intermediaries that there was classified information and other presidential records that remained at mar-a-lago. and somebody was telling them something untrue. either the lawyers, you know, unwittingly channeling information fed to them by trump that he knew was untrue, or the lawyers were party to a false statement to the justice department themselves. the doj mentioned these highly classified documents. and they said they would have to black out so much of the of a david, the underlying reasons that they had the search warrant. there would be nothing left to read.
schwarzenegger of actually being the aggressor, it confuses the fact that it s russia that s in ukraine, not the other way around. it sort of tries to reset to zero. in an information ecosystem like russia, where people really mostly get information fed by the government, it s not hard to reset that information. yeah. seems to me if you re in a propaganda war with arnold schwarzenegger you re already losing. sebastian, i want to talk to the situation on the ground in ukraine which is stalemate. that s the word being used by nato military officials right now. you ve written this really great piece in vanity fair.com about why the ukrainian resistance has been effective. if there is a stalemate and the russians resort to these terror tactics, indiscriminate bombing, levels cities, what does history tell us about the likely response and how that will have an impact on the ukrainian people?
clintons campaign? there is a couple take aways. i was a former federal investigator. this is not a joke now. you had bogus spurious information fed from the russians into our fbi that was used in a presidential daily brief. the president was briefed on fake russian information. brian: under the supervision of the national intelligence director james clapper while briefed by the fbi director james comey. think you might be aware of it, there might be leverage used against you once you assume office. i will take this to the second pingt here too. you are right. if this information was used god for bid in a document to get a warrant to tap anyone on the trump campaign, i mean, you want to hear about a scandal, the fbi used fake russian intel potentially? steve: i read in the new york post this morning this fake dossier was used to apparently justify a fisa warrant to spy, well,