people are free to consider, evaluate what they think ultimate people s motivations were. we don t reach a definitive answer. you re not making that decision. we are not making a decision on ultimately information evidence that we don t have that somebody may have acted. in my opinion, and i think the opinion of most of us on this side of the aisle at least to have talk to you today, i think there is tons of evidence of bias here. in fact, you have referred for further action to the attorney general. one case for criminal prosecution, if i understand it right, and other cases of how many other individuals? but i want to be clear. we are talking about the fisa as opposed to the opera. there is a distinction because the open conduct of the investigation. correct. i understand that and i appreciate your clarification.
you d love to get nancy pelosi under oath to answer, why is she really doing this, i think if you re an optimistic democrat you can t really think he s going to get convicted in the senate, we will tag him with impeachment and run against him next year, talking about how he s been disgraced and impeached but, of course, when gthis process ends up going nowhere he will claim vindication and rightly so but i d like to emphasize, we have been talking about the bogus process, what it s trying to doa is prevent information evidence that supports the president from coming out. they do not want hunter biden to be under oath answering questions. still ahead as the house moves ahead with its impeachment inquiry all eyes also on the senate, liberal groups are targeting some vulnerable republicans, karl rove on the politics of impeachment heading into 2020.
so evan, what s the timing do you think that we re looking at for the public? well, for the public first of all there s a couple of steps barr has introduced here that laura and jarrett just outlined. he might give members of congress the principle conclusions, but then beyond that it appears he s going to take some time, perhaps weeks before he prepares what we ll call the barr report, which is going to distill what robert mueller has found. so that s going to be an additional amount of time. he looks like he s trying to figure out a way to not release the full mueller report. it appears he is trying to avoid it. now, the question is, erin, will he be successful in that? you ve seen over the last couple of years the justice department has sort of established a bit of precedent in releasing the information, underlying information evidence found in an
that s why that information has to be pure and clean. sean: the grassily graham memo says that the dossier was the bulk of information evidence and so they hand this over. now, three months later, you got james comey. right. saying to trump it s not verified and salacious. but it s only a foote note as we understand it to the fisa court. it may have political origins. they knew hillary bought it. they know she paid for it. they knew it was even probably not verified but they didn t tell the judge. what should happen now? well, the judge needs to bring them back before him. they should all be held in contempt at very minimum for bringing false information to a judge. that s more than lying by omission. they did not give the judge all the facts. i believe it was very falsified what they did. it needs to go back before the judge and needs to be wiped out. everything you always hear
all the the de. i did the hearing of joe lieberman two years ago on the threat military bases domestic terrorists from homegrown terrorists. that s always out there. especially what happened with major hasan at fort hood. no one as far as i know knows exactly what this is. i have heard the same reports that you have is soldier-on-soldier and one dead. i m hearing the second thing you are from my sources. of all places, you think there are certain places particularly safe, grade schools is one, and military installations is another. well, again, i don t want to prejudge. this but the hearing that we had, we got information evidence very significant concerns with in the military people in the military who did have violent tendencies and terrorist inclinations in the military and not being removed. why not being removed. i think it s political correctness to be honest with you. i was very concerned. senator lieberman and i were very concerned about this. there were a number of peo