Geostrategic challenge with the rise of china poses for the United States, not just today but in the future. The communist party led people were public of china through unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, market manipulation and very prominently, in my view, nonreciprocal treatment, not just in the economic round but in many realms i has been a fore in the Global Economy that undercuts the resiliency and strength of the u. S. Economy. China has been one of the worlds fastestgrowing economies averaging close to 10 growth from 19792015. In 2014 china overtook the United States ass the Worlds Largest economy purchasing power parity basis according to the International Monetary fund. I believe that there is a strong eipartisan interest hopefully we will see that today in establishing a longterm economic United States strategy with our allies that focuses on reciprocity, intellectual property theft, and ultimately, from the United States perspective out competing the chines
Good morning. This hearing will now come to order. I am pleased to welcome our distinguished panel of Witnesses Today is the economic and security subcommittee. He focuses on the very important topic that i think has a lot of bipartisan interest in. And that is the economic and geostrategic challenge that the rise of china poses for the United States. Much as today, but in the future. China, communist party, Peoples Republic Party of china. Unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft and market manipulation and very prominently in my view, m nonreciprocal treatment. Not just an economic room but in many realms. It has been a force in the Global Economy that undercuts the resiliency and strength of the u. S. Economy. China has been one of the worlds Fastest Growing economies. Averaging close to 10 percent growth from 1979 to 2016. In 2014, china was the Worlds Largest economy and nursing power bases according to the international monetary. I believe there is a strong bipartisan
The associations they have with Community Organizations they can provide a conduit understanding about the San Francisco waterfront we also have five seats, attributed to liaisons to the advisory groups, they hold so much knowledge about different sessions of the waterfront, we wanted to make sure that was included in the mix as well. But to be able to up mrement and create an supplement and create an opportunity for more people in the process, more than just 3032 people we have proposed waterfront plan Advisory Team complex where we recognize San Franciscoians, have a large breadth of non, there may be a number of candidates in process, but do not have the the Time Commitment available to full the full 1824 month process, but they might have source issue specific information that is pepful to this process in the area of resilience and recreation and open space in transportation, in urban waterfront design and plans. In labor and work force interests along the waterfront as well as fin
Want this to be fair for everyone. I know john and jay you will get there for us. Thank you. We have confidence. Thank you everyone who shows up today rewant to thank the National Park service for hearing our message as well. Thank you. Item 11 c informational presentation on public process participation and schedule for the update on the waterfront Land Use Plan. Thank you many. President members of the commission, i will start with introductory remarks, while many gets the slide show manny gets the slide show up. And the proposed process Going Forward to up gate the water Land Use Plan for all of its property, the Public Participation element of that public process, is probably the most important thing to make sure we refresh and have citywide and regional understanding about what are the issues facing the port and what are the kinds of balancing i think this last item illustrated that the Port Commission is charged with balancing a number of competing objectiveses to improve the wat
This process in the area of resilience and recreation and open space in transportation, in urban waterfront design and plans. In labor and work force interests along the waterfront as well as financial capital, and financing tools, that the Port Commission should be considering so we have proposed creating Advisory Teams, that are focused around those additional topics so people who have a background in that, and want to participate, there is a place to do that on board, the next 1824 months, all of this in process with the updated plan would be with a city team, with our sister agencies here in the city and with bc d. C. In state plan, that is the broad framework trying to put this together. In order to provide for people to have tossing their hat in the ring to participate in the process, were proposing outreach in a number of ways one in which we are scheduling briefings with each of the members of the board of supervisors, so they know in general what the ports efforts are to updat