that she wanted a single-payer system, let s have her argue that. stand up and make the case to the american people that s the kind of health care system we want. that would be insightful. she went on record saying this. her feelings have evolved. that was 20 years ago. do you think they have evolved back now? i wish they would. don t you think it s politically expedient? no, i think back then, she believed it, and now she doesn t think it would work. i happen to think it would. did she not say it at the time? yes, she did. not now, but 20 years ago. when you were 19. but my point is, while she s telling the media one thing, she s telling her best friend the exact opposite the way i understand it. let me bring up one other tidbit. how about general petraeus, dana, our friend, the comments he had about hillary being supportive, saying in the aftermath, the wake of benghazi, he thought she handled herself, conducted herself in a good way.
the occupy group. they kind of were, let s face it. they had a legitimate grievance. i had a dream one time that rosie o donnell said something mean about me, but i didn t realize it was a dream for like three weeks. i was really upset. that s a medical condition, when you confuse what do you think that means? if you can t tell the difference between your waking and leaping life, that could lead to some serious problems. i was working some seriously long hours at the time. i was so upset. i remember the dream. she actually gave me a shot, a real one, when i came to work for fox. she said, there s a guy, calls himself a liberal. he s an ant hole what did she call you, an ant hole? all right. good story. it s up lifting. wow, unusual for you. i know. up next, general david petraeus thinks hillary would make a great president. why would he say that? that s according to a new book,
dominated by progressives. didn t, in the last few weeks, you said you don t even think she s going to be the nominee. i said she would never get a free ride, and she won t. some people think she s never going to run. i think she ll be the nominee, but she could not be. top runners tend to stumble. she is not going to get a free ride. only presidents who seek re-election get free rides in primaries and caucuses. i have never, ever heard of a mamger party candidate who was the front runner in the party not having challengers, and i believe she will this time. greg, you have any thoughts on it? i think the idea that she has problems on the left is a bit of kabuki theater so it makes her look like she s a centrist. oh, my god, liberals don t like her. the big question will be, will there be democrats willing to cross her and bill a second time? because if hillary does win, you ll be washing bill s underwear down by the river. i think there s something to be said about that.
new revelations we discussed earlier affect hillary in 2016? according to petraeus, if they re like benghazi, not much at all. in a new book entitled hrc, out tomorrow, he said, quote, she would make a tremendous president. like a lot of great leaders, her most impressive qualities were most visible in tough times. in the wake of the benghazi attacks, for example, she was extraordinarily resolute, determined and in control. let me just say, i m not sure if petraeus is going to matter much as somebody who would indorse hillary. i think hillary frankly has got some problems on her left. and i m not sure that petraeus necessarily helps that right now. she s trying to move to the left a little bit, but she staked herself out at a centrist, like her husband, and this is a party in the primaries at least are
what was going on during or, oh, what difference does it make, or any of that? cleaning it up after. she was excellent with the generals when it came to when she was on the armed services committee. they loved her. she s gault a good reputation with them, that s true. the bigger point is how easy it is nowadays to attain power and hold on to it for decades despite doing so little. we re a country that thrived on competition, but we can t go beyond two parties with the same faces. whether it s the left or right, we have the same jerks paraded out in front of us, and we just accept them. maybe we re tired of the clintons, the bushes. that s how you got obama. that s true, maybe the greatest progressive president in the history of the democrats. that was the right thing to do. that s a good point. they have to find their obama. they haveened fount their obama yet, which is why they re going to lose to hillary. we re going to talk more