last statement is translation: i heard one of your last statement is here translation: i heard one of your last statement is here in translation: i heard one of your last statement is here in your- last statement is here in your european tour when you said that you didn t expect a breakthrough from these negotiations. we did not expect a breakthrough from these negotiations either. what we expect as concrete answers to our concrete proposals, and compliance with the obligations that were adopted at the highest level within the 0ecd. i refer particularly to the principle of the indivisibility of security is one of the obligation of countries not to strengthen their own security at the expense of the security of others. we would very much be interested to learn how the us interprets these obligations and principles. the us secretary of state antony blinken said he wants to address russia s concerns and hopes the talks the bottom line is the this. this is a critical moment. you are
a greater western troop presence near your border. you say you think putin is looking for a way out. what specifically do you see that indicates that? first of all, he says he keeps saying that, oh, i never intended to invade ukraine. well, of course we know we take that for what it s worth. second, however, he has exchanged notes with the united states. they have exchanged ideas and written responses back and forth. the foreign minister lavrov has sent a message to 57 countries in osce asking for information or ideas about a very nebulous concept called the in divisibility of security. that step is clearly going to take months for any kind of response. they re looking to delay, to change the subject from an invasion to a more negotiated
means that russia cannot be threatened by anything that nato does. i want to stress, nato is not a threatening intimidating or aggressive alliance. that is not what nato does. nato has kept the peace in our continent for so long and achieved so much by being a defensive alliance. that is what nato does. and you cannot promote the indivisibility of peace in the european land mass by putting 130,000 troops on the borders of ukraine. i think there is an opportunity to talk on all the subjects that we just described. it is a very good opportunity for us to put our heads together and try to find ways of reassuring russia without compromising those fundamental principles of nato s
is the right one. ijust want the moment we think that the package is the right one. i just want to stress that it would be an absolute disaster if it were to come to that. and if there were to be serious bloodshed on ukrainian soil. i know that people in russia must be thinking about this as well and i know that in the kremlin and across russia they must be wondering whether it is really sensible to expand the blood of russian soldiers in a war that i think would be catastrophic and also a pointless, tragic and vastly economically costly to russia. all i would say is that this is the moment now to think about another way forward and president putin talks about the indivisibility of security across the european continent, by which he
term confrontation with russia. what is the message that vladimir putin absorbs watching a hastily called nato meeting? that everybody is ganging up against him, which is the exact thing he was trying to avoid, right? going into this war, all he kept talking about was the indivisibility, he gets a say alongside nato. now the absolute opposite is happening. nato is unified against him, shutting him out, punishing him. does it change anything to him, though? does he change anything about how he s approaching ukraine? i think it makes it worse. i think it is the cornered animal situation. his he s making his paranoid delusions a reality, so he s getting more and more paranoid and i think he s going to get more and more aggressive and sadly i think it is ukraine that is going to get the brunt of the punishment. and we should also mention, a stunning development, that you