the supreme court?nd review in i don t think so. i do not think so either and i agree with your assessment. i don t think you get a fair trial in new york, i don t think you get a fair trial in dc and i don t think you get a fair trial in fulton county, professor, to be very blunt. i think both counties, let me get to all the other guest. i will let you way and next, your thoughts on this. this indictment strikes me as amateur joke. frankie, jack smith and special counsel should be indicted for stupidity, it s that bad. but he has this reputable habit of bringing politically driven prosecutions by contorting the law in mangling evidence and these four this definition of a stretch, a gumby indictment conspiracy to defraud the government because donald trump challenged certification of electors on january 6. he s entitled to do the under the electoral
they wanted to remove the ukrainian prosecutor that joe biden ultimately forced out in less than six hours, leveraging 1 billion of your tax dollars to do it. and by the way, the net result of that, he helped enrich his son and family in the process. and here we are, the very next day, another coincidence? which is today, august 1, jack smith indicts donald trump once again, over the riot on january 6. although, not really about the riot. despite trump s direction to peacefully, many of you will not peacefully and patriotically march to the capitol so your voices will be heard. by the way, which is not in the indictment. the certification of the 2020 election, was delayed by a few hours, because of the riots. now joe biden s doj wants donald trump to spend the rest of his life in prison. by the way, the doj and not even charging trump with causing the riots. they completely ignored the criminal referrals from the pointless
physicalblun incapacity. incapac i would say he s one fall away from from an avalanche of democrats abandoning him, coupled with now a significant, very real bribery scandal allegation. what happens to him? absolutely. cobsoland well, i mean, the conversation, the narrative was maybe, maybe not. he will run again.w now it s he probably won tit s e and then the narrative is now maybe he won t even be able to finis even bee h out his fira and the narrative was, well, maybe there s bobulinskirrativ and maybe archer. and now that the narrative is, well, there s irs whistleblower and there s oligarchs in ukraine that have evidence and there s document s. so it s mounting. it s accelerating both his physical encompassis phy ci and the case against him. and that s reflected sean inrils this shrill, desperate effort to criminalize this candidate, donald trump, and ruin himru in an asymmetricalin fashion.
look the political effectiveness. and it should not go unnoticed that every time there s a scandal with joe biden, the next day you re with in, there seems to be a new indictment donald trump. this run his of devon archer s testimony, as you mentioned. the political effect of these events will be very little in donald trump. we see this play out time and time again is the hat trick of indictments. every time the numbers go up. devon archer testimony was the beginning i think. there still eric other business executives, and china. hunter biden himself. james, has just begun the deposition phase. i came out yes i think it is undeniable. corrupt influence peddling, bribery-based regime, that will be undeniable to democrats and it will be the problem in front of their face. they will get to the problem of kamala harris but they have to do with joe biden. i think of joe biden and we play this so often problem people get mad at me if i play it again.
donald trump thought or didn t think but instead, they tried to use a reasonable person test to suggest that because the director radcliffe, attorney general bar and others had told president they lost somehow, no reasonable person would believe that. and all this indictment a thing that s fascinating to me, is that jack smith and ms. there was fraud in the last election. he says essentially that there wasn t the outcome determinant amount of fraud, but enough fraud. this trial if and when it goes could have really interesting evidence on how much fraud is in the american system and frankly how much for the americans are willing to withstand. we discussed a lot of issues like laws for example, partisan observers, are allowed to watch the vote count not from a dozen feet away, that didn t happen according to the law in some states, professor. then you have the issue in pennsylvania, the issue in wisconsin. a stinging dissent by the