people around him. it s not the whole ball game. he could say, robert mueller saying, here are my findings, i find significant evidence of collusion or obstruction, i think there is more smoke and i refer to you for further proceedings as you see necessary, especially given the doj policy against the sitting president, indicting a sitting president. i think a key question will be did mueller hold off on further action because of that policy or the quality of the evidence? you know, i m so glad you brought that up. in my discussion earlier this hour with senator coons, that s what i was getting at, should we be surprised the mueller report will not have an indictment when the policy says you can t die. it s into the law, it s a policy. i don t mean to suggest that s what the finding will be. there really couldn t have been a different outcome today, right? there is no possible way that mueller was going to indict the
i appreciate senator coons, i appreciate it. thank you. what do we have? watching on cnn, are you that delusion a delusional, thanking mueller? you stating that there is still crimes that could have been committed poisoning mind and viewers of this country. hey, deso, maybe you read the report. i have yet to read it. i fullied a knowledge the advance reporting, there will be no further indictments. i raise a reason why is the justice department policy that you can t indict a sitting president. i think that s entirely fair and reasonable. but if you listen to the totality of my commentary, i fullying a only in it appears to be a win for the president and i don t beskdrudge him. i m happen for the country. i as an american are happy with that outcome. i want to sa light mueller, the president has been kicking his
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20190323:03:38:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
associates after all those meetings with the russians. evident. it may be weaker and not only that insufficient evidence. we don t have prove beyond a reasonable doubt. the most interesting thing is that key question here that bill bar why didn t bob mueller take action against the president? it could be that he complied with doj s policy against indicting a sitting president. which goes towards transparency. the only reason you didn t do it is that policy. then congress is the other check. do you want to give a number before i bring in the senator. i number of how many people decline to charge? that is really that is not fair. we respect if you don t have the answer. stay with me. i m going to bring in senator richard bloomenthal and we should mention a former prosecutor. thanks for joining me, senator.
it s important not to speculate, but i think what we do know is that any time a federal prosecutor is investigating anything, it often leads to additional charges. in other words, you start it s like pulling that thread and stuff starts to unravel. and that s because the more information you find, the more people you find, then the more potential both people who may be coconspirators. so that is a possibility certainly. it also could be ensuring that, you know, everything you need to know about who are your witnesses or are your targets. we don t know until we know. but i think what s important to say here is the southern district of new york is going to remain extremely aggressive in the pursuit of facts and evidence, and they will go after anyone they think has committed a crime with the exception of indicting a sitting president. so who does that leave in this investigation? i mean, that s what i wondered